Step-by-step explanation:
Case 1 : |x| > a, => x > a or x < -a
Case 2 : |x| < a, => -a < x < a
Since this question follows Case 1, we will have an "or" inequality.
First subtract the 20 from both sides so it is 3x=2x+4 thens ubtract the 2 so x equals 4
Answer:
Any [a,b] that does NOT include the x-value 3 in it.
Either an [a,b] entirely to the left of 3, or
an [a,b] entirely to the right of 3
Step-by-step explanation:
The intermediate value theorem requires for the function for which the intermediate value is calculated, to be continuous in a closed interval [a,b]. Therefore, for the graph of the function shown in your problem, the intermediate value theorem will apply as long as the interval [a,b] does NOT contain "3", which is the x-value where the function shows a discontinuity.
Then any [a,b] entirely to the left of 3 (that is any [a,b] where b < 3; or on the other hand any [a,b] completely to the right of 3 (that is any [a,b} where a > 3, will be fine for the intermediate value theorem to apply.
Answer:
7
Step-by-step explanation:
21×1/3
21÷3=7
hope I've helped
Answer:
c. Rational
because → whole numbers are positive and Starts from 0 so not whole number
Integers can be negative and positive
Examples of numbers that are not integers are: -1.43, 1 3/4, 3.14, . 09, and 5,643.1.
Irrational number that cannot be written in p/q
but -2.4 written in p/q = -24/100
<h3>so c. Rational Number is correct</h3>