1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Paha777 [63]
3 years ago
11

How did the united states view france in britain around 1950s?

History
1 answer:
iVinArrow [24]3 years ago
6 0
Because the British government help the United States
You might be interested in
Read the passage from The Pillow Book. "When I make myself imagine what it is like to be one of those women who live at home, fa
nasty-shy [4]

Answer:

“yet have had no opportunity to find out what the world is like”

Explanation:

This one seems to feel bad for the wifes? because the tone feels like they are maybe sad? unlike the other one's

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which statement best explains why Texas seceded from the Union in 1861?
Luden [163]

Answer:

Tt had replaced its governor, Sam Houston, who had refused to take an oath of allegiance to the Confederacy.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Which leader supported Pan-Arabism in the mid-twentieth century?
Gre4nikov [31]
Answer: C) Gamal Abdel Nasser
8 0
3 years ago
Why westward expansion create more conflict between the north and south
Eva8 [605]

In 1803, President Thomas Jefferson purchased the territory of Louisiana from the French government for $15 million. The Louisiana Purchase stretched from the Mississippi River to the Rocky Mountains and from Canada to New Orleans, and it doubled the size of the United States. To Jefferson, westward expansion was the key to the nation’s health: He believed that a republic depended on an independent, virtuous citizenry for its survival, and that independence and virtue went hand in hand with land ownership, especially the ownership of small farms. (“Those who labor in the earth,” he wrote, “are the chosen people of God.”) In order to provide enough land to sustain this ideal population of virtuous yeomen, the United States would have to continue to expand. The westward expansion of the United States is one of the defining themes of 19th-century American history, but it is not just the story of Jefferson’s expanding “empire of liberty.” On the contrary, as one historian writes, in the six decades after the Louisiana Purchase, westward expansion “very nearly destroy[ed] the republic.”

Manifest Destiny

By 1840, nearly 7 million Americans–40 percent of the nation’s population–lived in the trans-Appalachian West. Following a trail blazed by Lewis and Clark, most of these people had left their homes in the East in search of economic opportunity. Like Thomas Jefferson, many of these pioneers associated westward migration, land ownership and farming with freedom. In Europe, large numbers of factory workers formed a dependent and seemingly permanent working class; by contrast, in the United States, the western frontier offered the possibility of independence and upward mobility for all. In 1843, one thousand pioneers took to the Oregon Trail as part of the “Great Emigration.”

Did you know? In 1853, the Gadsden Purchase added about 30,000 square miles of Mexican territory to the United States and fixed the boundaries of the “lower 48” where they are today.

In 1845, a journalist named John O’Sullivan put a name to the idea that helped pull many pioneers toward the western frontier. Westward migration was an essential part of the republican project, he argued, and it was Americans’ “manifest destiny” to carry the “great experiment of liberty” to the edge of the continent: to “overspread and to possess the whole of the [land] which Providence has given us,” O’Sullivan wrote. The survival of American freedom depended on it.

Westward Expansion and Slavery

Meanwhile, the question of whether or not slavery would be allowed in the new western states shadowed every conversation about the frontier. In 1820, the Missouri Compromise had attempted to resolve this question: It had admitted Missouri to the union as a slave state and Maine as a free state, preserving the fragile balance in Congress. More important, it had stipulated that in the future, slavery would be prohibited north of the southern boundary of Missouri (the 36º30’ parallel) in the rest of the Louisiana Purchase.

However, the Missouri Compromise did not apply to new territories that were not part of the Louisiana Purchase, and so the issue of slavery continued to fester as the nation expanded. The Southern economy grew increasingly dependent on “King Cotton” and the system of forced labor that sustained it. Meanwhile, more and more Northerners came to believed that the expansion of slavery impinged upon their own liberty, both as citizens–the pro-slavery majority in Congress did not seem to represent their interests–and as yeoman farmers. They did not necessarily object to slavery itself, but they resented the way its expansion seemed to interfere with their own economic opportunity.

Westward Expansion and the Mexican War

Despite this sectional conflict, Americans kept on migrating West in the years after the Missouri Compromise was adopted. Thousands of people crossed the Rockies to the Oregon Territory, which belonged to Great Britain, and thousands more moved into the Mexican territories of California, New Mexico and Texas. In 1837, American settlers in Texas joined with their Tejano neighbors (Texans of Spanish origin) and won independence from Mexico. They petitioned to join the United States as a slave state.

3 0
3 years ago
India will fall back quite rapidly through the centuries into the barbarism and privations of the Middle Ages. Winston Churchill
Ivan

Answer: India would not be able to govern itself in the modern world without the British.

Explanation:

The British ruled India for the better part of a century and during that time, India was their most populated and important colony and they made sure to rule it as actively as they could which is why when the Indians began demanding independence, there were some that did not approve.

Winston Churchill was one of those. He believed that if the British were to stop governing India, it would go back to a state of barbarism and anarchy. The British people who thought like him therefore believed that British rule in India was necessary for it to remain stable as India could not govern itself.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In 150 to 200 words, differentiate between the government-sanctioned violence in China under Mao and the government-sanctioned v
    7·1 answer
  • James Hogg rose in the Democratic Party in Texas in the 1880 and 1890s by co-opting reform policies of Populist critics of the D
    7·1 answer
  • In may 2001, ________ began an african tour and met with president thabo mbeki concerning aids.
    7·1 answer
  • The new french constution allowed active citizen to vote what is an active citizen
    9·1 answer
  • How do the characteristics of the planets moons and smaller objects in the solar system compare?
    9·1 answer
  • What were the colonists looking for when they came to jamestown virginia in 1607
    15·1 answer
  • Why did shakespears choose to write this play in the meter of imbac pentameter
    10·1 answer
  • How did the British eventually capture Charleston in 1780?
    8·1 answer
  • Main Leaders of the battle of Great Britain
    7·1 answer
  • Why did so many settlers rush to Oklahoma to claim land in 1889?
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!