Answer:
number 4
Step-by-step explanation:
let me know if i am worng and thank you
Answer:
A
Step-by-step explanation:
Because the gravity of the earth
Answer: 35
Step-by-step explanation:
Let the number of nickels be x
Then the number of dimes, using
ONE PART = TOTAL MINUS OTHER PART,
is 35-x. ( hope this helps have a good day/night :) )
Answer:
<h2>Kelly is wrong, with this congruent parts, we can conclude that triangles are congruent.</h2>
Step-by-step explanation:
To demonstrate congruent triangles, we need to use the proper postulates. There are at least 5 postulates we can use.
- Angle-Angle-Side Theorem (AAS theorem).
- Hypotenuse-Leg Theorem (HL theorem).
- Side-Side-Side Postulate (SSS postulate).
- Angle-Side-Angle Postulate (ASA postulate).
- Side-Angle-Side Postulate (SAS postulate).
In this case, Kelly SAS postulate, because the corresponding sides-angles-sides are congruent, i.e., KL ≅ MN and LM ≅ KN, also, all corresponding angles are congruent.
So, as you can see, only using SAS postulate, the congruency can be demonstrated. (Refer to the image attached to see an example of SAS postulate)
Answer:
A = $ 1,987,379.10 + 700,000= $2,687,379.10
Step-by-step explanation:
15% = 0.15 rate per tear
A = P (1+r/n)^nt
A = 700,000 (1+0.015/12)^12*7
A = 700,000 (1+0.0125)^84
A = 700,000 ((0.9875)^84
A = 700,000 (2.839113)