Answer:
This allowed the chiefs to not meet and form alliances against him. Meanwhile, he continued to invade the desired territories.
Explanation:
by separating the properties of the Chiefs, Kamehameha prevented them from uniting, forming alliances and managing to prevent him from achieving his goals. This was an insightful strategy, which managed in an exemplary way to reduce the risks of defeat for Kamehameha, in addition to stimulating his advance within the desired territories.
Answer:
the south
Explanation:
the south would oppose the abolition of slavery because they wouldn't have anyone to work for their farm. (most of the farms are in the south)
The passage shows that Californian politics, and in particular, political advancement methods, were not wholly bound by law as they are now.
Governmental institutions and government control was weaker at that time, so it was difficult to enforce the law consistently. Because of it, people did not have a strong commitment to following legal paths for advancement. Revolutions and rebellions were more effective in seizing power than political campaigns, and there were few negative repercussions for those who chose that method.
It was "England" that governed with a monarchy, but whose leader was limited in power due to the lawmaking body of Parliament, since the monarchy became less and less powerful over time, as England became more democratic.
Hazrat Umer developed the idea of Fajar namaz as he thaught that pray is better then sleeep
