I would go with A. B would come next. So yeah A
Answer:
A good summary of an essay should probably include the main idea of each paragraph, and the main evidence supporting that idea, unless it is not relevant to the article or essay as a whole. A summary does not need a conclusion, but if the original ends with a message to the reader this should not be left out.
Explanation:
A good summary of an essay should probably include the main idea of each paragraph, and the main evidence supporting that idea, unless it is not relevant to the article or essay as a whole. A summary does not need a conclusion, but if the original ends with a message to the reader this should not be left out.
The anwser is %75 im adding extra words cause it has to be atleast 20 characters lol
the first paragraph is talking about people should use public transport more to reduce the production of pollution to help decrease high amount of pollution, in towns and cities, carbon dioxide production can affect weather, and the environments it also decreases traffic and helps people
the second paragraph talks about how public transport isn't it a valid option for people who travel out of cities to in small towns, they speak how they need energy efficient cars to reduce the production of pollution and gas
Answer:
Illustration/example would go with Tells what something is; useful in all subjects
Classification/division would go with useful in Botany, biology, and anatomy classes
cause/effect would go with useful to describe how to refurnish furniture
extended definition would go with reasoning from several particular examples to establish a general principle.
inductive reasoning would go with drawing conclusions from implied information
deductive reasoning would go with fallacy in logic that assumes a cause and effect relationship because of sequence
inferences would go with drawing a particular conclusion from general premises
process analysis would go with structure used in history and science explaining reasons for certain events or phenomena
comparison/contrast would go with using a story to make a point
post hoc would go with reasoning from several particular examples to establish general principle
Explanation:
