Answer:
Explanation:
Given
<u>Cost</u>
per mouse pad
Revenue
Solving (a): The cost function
Let the number of mouse pad be x and the cost function be c(x).
Solving (b): The revenue function
Represent this with r(x)
Solving (c): The break-even point
This is the point where r(x) = c(x)
So, we have:
Collect Like Terms
Solve for x
Answer:
- <u><em>To maximize the purchasing power of his income, Juand should accept the offert of Atlanta, GA.</em></u>
Explanation:
To answer this question you need the <em>comparative costs of living</em> in each of the trhee cities.
In a similar question, you can find the <em>cost of iiving indexes</em> for <em>Atlanta, Boston,</em> and <em>San Francisco</em>. Here is the table:
<em />
<em> Cost of living index</em>
<em>City (100 = U.S. City average)</em>
<em>Atlanta, GA 98</em>
<em>Boston, MA 160</em>
<em>San Francisco, CA 245</em>
Thus, to determine which offer <em>Juan should accept to maximize the purchasing power of his income</em>, divide each income by the cost of living index.
<u>Atlanta, GA:</u>
<u />
<u>Boston, MA</u>
<u>San Francisco, CA</u>
Rank the adjusted earnings in decreasing order:
- $510.20 > $437.50 > $407.16
Hence, in spite of the nominal earnings in Atlanta are the lowest, the higher cost of living indexes of the other cities, make that the offer from Atlanta the best one.
Answer:
b. $22.500.
The estimate of bad debt expense is $22,500
Explanation:
Method of Bad Debt estimation = Percentage of credit sale
Bad Debt Expense = 3% of credit sale ($750,000)
Bad Debt Expense = 3% x $750,000
Bad Debt Expense = $22,500
Answer:
I think it is art
Explanation:
it shows the color between each layer
Answer:
179 units
Explanation:
The computation of the economic order quantity is shown below:
where,
Annual demand = 1,200 cases
Ordering cost = $40
And, the annual carrying cost is $3 per case
Now placing these values to the above formula
So, the optimal order quantity is
= 179 units
Hence, the optimal order quantity is 179 units
