Answer:
13. Charlie would be excluded for cause;
14. the plaintiff provides proof only up to the level of “clear and convincing,” Casey can still be acquitted.
Explanation:
Since it was realised that Charlie has a relationship with on of the parties summoned for a case, this will lead to Charlie been removed and excluded for cause. This is because it is believed that due to the fact that he has a relationship with the person, there may be bias which may lead to a false outcome regarding the case.
For the second question, Cash can be acquitted if there's proof which is provided by the plaintiff and the proof is clear enough and convincing.
Answer and Explanation:
The journal entries are shown below:
1. Processor charges - Credit card expense Dr ($10,500 × 3%) $315
Cash Dr $10,185
To Sales Revenue $10,500
(Being the credit card expense is recorded)
For recording this we debited the cash and expenses as it increased the asset and expenses and credited the sales revenue as it also increased the revenue
Processor charges - debit card expense Dr ($6,000 × 3%) $180
Cash Dr $5,820
To Sales Revenue $6,000
(Being the debit card expense is recorded)
For recording this we debited the cash and expenses as it increased the asset and expenses and credited the sales revenue as it also increased the revenue
2. Cash Dr $10,500
To Sales Revenue $10,500
(Being the cash receipt is recorded)
For recording this we debited the cash as it increased the asset and credited the sales revenue as it also increased the revenue
Cash Dr $6,000
To Sales Revenue $6,000
(Being the cash receipt is recorded)
For recording this we debited the cash as it increased the asset and credited the sales revenue as it also increased the revenue
Answer:
Their debt ratio is about 0.039.
Explanation:
Given information:
liabilities = $16700
Assets = $433,000
We need to find their debt ratio.
Substitute the given values in the above formula.
Therefore, their debt ratio is about 0.039.
<span>When a monopolist switches from charging a single price to perfect price discrimination, it reduces the consumer surplus. Consumer surplus is defined as the difference between what a consumer believes they should pay for a good or service and the total amount that they actually do pay. The amount they pay is known as the market price and what they are willing to pay is noted on the demand curve. </span>
Explanation:
In the case of the complements goods, if the price of the soda rises, the demand would be decreased and the supply would rises. Since the soda and pizza are complementary goods so the impact of one good would be the same for another good also
Moreover, we also know that the price and the demand has an inverse relationship but the price and the supply has a direct relationship
