The Mongols treated the non-muslim subjects most fairly, while the Ottomans treated them the least fairly.
The Mongols were religiously tolerant because they conquered and rule through manpower rather than religion. The Ottomans were the least fair to non-muslims. It is close between the Umayyads and the Ottomans, but the only difference is the amount of discrimination (per se) held against non-muslims. While the Umayyads only had the jizya (tax paid if you were non-muslim), the Ottomans had distinctive restrictions on non-muslims. They had dress codes according to their religion and could only reside in neighborhoods who's residents were of the same religion (under the Ottomans).
Your answer is simply,
Bourgeoise.
This passage is about the speech of President Jackson in Congress, where he defended the process of remorse of the Indians.
The use of the word "progessive" refers to the continuation of a process begun earlier, where the Indians were massacred and expelled from their territories to the detriment of the white man's civilization. The former president used that term as a way to slow down an attitude that today would be understood as barbarism, but one that is part of US history.
Answer:
The purpose of Winston Churchill's excerpt was to warn the United State that Europe was threatened by the <em><u>USSR</u></em>.
Explanation:
The "Iron Curtain Speech" was delivered by Winston Churchill to emphasize the need for the US and Britain to act as peacekeepers for the threat imposed by the USSR. He implored on the two nations to spearhead the need to maintain peace against the power of the communist USSR.
In his now-famous speech, former British Prime Minister Churchill stated <em>"From Stettin in the Baltic to Trieste in the Adriatic, an iron curtain has descended across the Continent."</em> He also went on to express his belief that the Soviet Union's communist stance and desire to expand will <em>"cause new serious difficulties in the British and American zones."</em> He then appealed for <em>"[T]he safety of the world [that] requires a new unity in Europe, from which no nation should be permanently outcast."</em>
