They paid for columbia’s journey so they could profit from trade
To protect there kingdom
<span />
Jefferson felt that it was the perfectly fine as the obligation of a people to oust an oppressive government since it is not out of the question to the general population all in all to ensure each other, else it would influence their security and joy.
From the Declaration of Independence. Not exclusively do you have the privilege to oust your administration, it is an obligation put on us by establishing fathers. On the off chance that our legislature double-crosses us, acts other than as per our desires, or we feel changes should be made, it is our commitment to do as such.
Answer:
World power.
Explanation:
United States defeated Spain in the famous Spanish-American War in 1898 and established themselves as a dominant force in Americas. Not only that Spain was defeated, but the country lost all of the colonies in this part of the world. On the other side, United States strengthen their role, as they gained new territories on the Pacific and in Latin America.
The overwhelming consensus of observers in the 1890s, and historians ever since, is that an upsurge of humanitarian concern with the plight of the Cubans was the main motivating force that caused the war with Spain in 1898. McKinley put it succinctly in late 1897 that if Spain failed to resolve its crisis, the United States would see “a duty imposed by our obligations to ourselves, to civilization and humanity to intervene with force."Intervention in terms of negotiating a settlement proved impossible—neither Spain nor the insurgents would agree. Louis Perez states, "Certainly the moralistic determinants of war in 1898 has been accorded preponderant explanatory weight in the historiography."
By the 1950s, however, American political scientists began attacking the war as a mistake based on idealism, arguing that a better policy would be realism. They discredited the idealism by suggesting the people were deliberately misled by propaganda and sensationalist yellow journalism. Political scientist Robert Osgood, writing in 1953, led the attack on the American decision process as a confused mix of "self-righteousness and genuine moral fervor," in the form of a "crusade" and a combination of "knight-errantry and national self- assertiveness."
