No they did not treat them fairly it had to do with their race and rights
The larger states have more electoral votes and have a much greater influence. Since they have more electoral votes the it is for them.
The Chaldean Empire began on 605 B.C. and they claimed many lands that once belonged to the Assyrians, but Egypt was not one of them.
By the time that the Chaldean Empire started, it also started an alliance between the Assyrians and Egyptians to fight the Babylonians.
They both had their armies destroyed. Assyria was never to be recognized again as an independent power and Egypt retreated, becoming insignificant for a while.
Egypt used Greek mercenaries to get rid of the domain that the Assyrians had over them and they did go through a prosper time, but it for the Persians to show up and dominate them in the 500s B.C.
<span>divisions to their beliefs: Liberty versus strong government, small states versus large states, and slavery. </span>
Farming/ slavery.
This answer really depends on what the question is asking, the southern economy banked heavily off of farming, BUT it was impossible to provide and have such an abundance of crops without slavery. So, it depends on the options you have.
Hope this helps, man!
