Answer is: New York and Ohio lose seats most likely <span>due to below average population growth.
Also </span><span>Illinois, Michigan, Pennsylvania, West Virginia. Minnesota, Rhode Island and Alabama will likely lose seats </span>due to below average population growth. They <span>are growing in population, but at a rate slower than the national average.</span>
Marbury v. Madison is important as it established judicial review. I've written about it a few times on here today, so will work in other answers. John Adams tried to game the process and nominated Marbury to a post in the final hours of Adams' administration. The hitch was that the Secretary of State had to deliver a commission to make it official. Thomas Jefferson's Secretary of State, James Madison (future President), refused to deliver the commission.
Marbury, who was denied the post, sued.
The outcome of the case is a little murky for casual readers. In essence, though, Marbury still got hosed. He was told that he should have received the commission and that Madison was wrong but that the actual act by which he was nominated wasn't properly constructed.
So, the Supreme Court won the day by reviewing the actions of the other branches and poor Marbury got nothing.
A. Indira Gandhi.
^^^ The prime minister of 1966 in India. ^^^
Answer: Specifically, Defense Department officials said that if Soviet forces were to invade the Persian Gulf region, the United States should have the capability to hit back there or in Cuba, Libya, Vietnam or the Asian land mass of the Soviet Union itself.
Explanation:
"Funds for the European front and for strategic nuclear forces will rise, but the sharpest increases will go to equipment, supplies, military construction and airlift and sealift capability for the Rapid Deployment Force. The philosophy behind this, according to senior Pentagon officials, is that the United States must not simply be able to respond to an attack by the Soviet Union wherever it occurs, but also be able to strike back at areas of Soviet weakness."
The correct answer is D. Suffragists who protested outside the White House
Explanation:
The "Silent Sentinels" were a group of women that protest by using silence outside the White House on January of 1917 to show President Woodrow Wilson they supported women suffrage and therefore were suffragist as Woodrow did not support this. The group of women led protests every week for two years until the Nineteenth Amendment was passed and this ratified women could vote as any citizen could be denied to vote on the basis of gender. But unfortunately, during this time of protests, multiple cases of abuse and unfair arrest occurred against women. Therefore, the "Silent Sentinels" were basically female suffragists who protested outside the White House to try to defend and ratify their right to vote.
