Answer:
pull factor
Explanation:
The answer is "pull factor".
Pull factor is considered as a factor for migration to other countries or regions for better life prospects.
These are some of the factors which attract people or encourage people to leave their native country and migrate to another country in search of better living standards, good job opportunities, political and religious freedom, environmental safety, etc.
Pull and push factors are two great concerns of today's world which drain many people to other countries. They are generally considered as the north and south pole of the magnets.
Thus the answer is "pull factor".
Alex believes that women were inherently chaste and motivated by love, but men are inherently more vulgar & filled with physical intimacy. Alex is exhibiting a gendered love word.
Gender is the set of qualities that distinguishes between femininity and masculinity. This may involve intimate relations social systems and gender identity, depending on the setting. Most societies employ a gender binary, wherein gender is divided into two groups and persons are classified as belonging either one or the other; some who fall outside of these categories may be classified as non-binary. Some societies, such as the hijras of South Asia, have unique genders in addition to "man" and "woman," which are often referred to as tertiary genders. Most experts think that gender is an important aspect of social organization. In some cases, the term gender is employed to replace gender without a clear conceptual distinction.
Learn more about conceptual here
brainly.com/question/13031068
#SPJ4
The answer is something called a "junta."
To get into more detail, these types of groups usually consist of military officers. But that's besides the point. The answer is a junta.
Answer:
He received a charter from Queen Elizabeth to create a colony.
Explanation:
"On March 25, 1584 Elizabeth granted explorer Sir Walter Raleigh a charter to colonize the area of North America that was the future Virginia Colony - currently the coast of North Carolina."
Answer:
You should think about fair competition.
Explanation:
The ethics question here would be: Is the contribution I'm willing to pay to get the contract a bribery? So, if there are better firms than mine but they don't have the money to pay the contribution, does it mean I get preferential treatment because I can afford it? Wouldn't it be considered unfair by many?
This a common practice in business and although seen morally wrong by many, it is the only way to ensure some contracts are signed. People who advocate this way of dealing with allocating contracts say that it is a fair way, everybody has the opportunity in life to make money and some people would always make more than others. Critics say that it's unfair, especially for smaller firms and developing companies, as their chances to win big contracts are being reduced drastically.
