The philosophical difference between Maoism and traditional Marxism–Leninism is that the peasantry are the revolutionary vanguard in pre-industrial societies rather than the proletariat.
The above question seeks to analyze your writing ability and your perception of the Indian Removal Act. For this reason, it is not correct for me to write this letter to you, but I will show you how to write it.
First of all, you should know that the Indian Removal Act was established to remove Native Americans from the lands where they lived and forcibly place them on government-selected Indian reservations.
Although many people believe this was a good decision to protect the natives from the settlers' ambition. Others claim that this decision was abusive, that forced the displacement of the natives from their lands, and placed them in inferior lands. The natives, in turn, do not think that this decision was correct and fair.
You must research this law and determine your opinion of it, that is, you must determine whether this law was a good or bad decision.
After that, you can write your letter as follows:
- Start with a greeting to the person who will read your letter. This greeting can be "Dear Mr/Mrs ____" if you know the reader's name, or "Whom it may concern," if you don't know the reader's name.
- Then introduce yourself and show why you are writing the letter.
- Present your opinion on the Indian Removal Act, highlighting the reasons that made you build this opinion.
- Show if you think the results of the Indian Removal Act are positive or negative.
- End the letter by summarizing your arguments.
- Say goodbye cordially.
You can get more information about the Indian Removal Act at this link:
brainly.com/question/2035986
Answer:
The state of nature, in moral and political philosophy, religion, social contract theories and international law, is the hypothetical life of people before societies came into existence..
Answer:
1. b) The 14th amendment enabled the government to reinterpret the purpose and usage of the Bill of Rights.
2. c) The Supreme Court used incorporation because states were violating the Bill of Rights.
3. b) Incorporation binds states to the Bill of Rights rather than the Federal Government.
4. c) "When the 14th Amendment was ratified...., it placed limits on the kinds of laws states could pass"
5. d) The incorporation of the 14th amendment may not benefit all Americans equally.
Explanation:
- The Supreme Court has only adopted certain Bill of Rights modifications. They haven't protected all rights against governmental intrusion, so they're not done. C explains the Supreme Court's incorporation, so it's the most correct. The Supreme Court successfully utilized incorporation to stop state Bill of Rights violations.
- In general, incorporation has had a positive impact on American civil rights. As a result, it has ensured that both state and federal governments are held to the same standard in protecting the rights of individuals.
- State and municipal governments were compelled to defend "most liberties included in the Bill of Rights" under the 14th Amendment, which was originally intended for recently freed slaves. There was no need that states comply by the constraints it put on the federal government, as stated above. All of this is accurate. There was a Supreme Court decision that had a major influence on our federalist system that is referenced in this quotation about incorporation. A state's power is limited when it comes to federally protected rights when it comes to enacting an unlawful legislation.
