1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vedmedyk [2.9K]
3 years ago
12

The U.S. Supreme Court decision in Marbury v. Madison cemented the role of the courts to (8 points) A.) answer only to the will

of the people B.)confer last-minute judicial appointments C.)decide the winner when an election tally is tied D.)determine if laws are valid and enforceable
History
1 answer:
Lena [83]3 years ago
5 0
<span> D.)determine if laws are valid and enforceable</span>
You might be interested in
What did the Open Door Policy establish?
kolezko [41]

Answer:

Im not entirely sure if im right but i think its c. Sorry if i get it wrong

5 0
3 years ago
What group was opposed to Andrew Jackson's policies?
Elan Coil [88]
Bankers because they have to be the opposed
6 0
3 years ago
During the years 1945 to 1980, the cold war fluctuated between periods of confrontation and peaceful coexistence.
SSSSS [86.1K]
A.
soviet union expansionist ideology was to be curtailed by USA containment policy. This meant that whenever the soviet union tried to expand its dominion, the USA had to respond, often militarily resulting to numerous proxy wars.
b. detente
which was characterized by a period of easing tensions was a period of peaceful coexistence that saw the signing of several treaties during the Nixon administration and ended in 1979.
c. conflicts in the such areas as Cuba,Korean Peninsula,and Vietnam were crucial red days during the war.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
True or false Six States had to approve the Constitution before it was affected​
Nikitich [7]

False. It was 9 states.

7 0
3 years ago
The cases of Miranda v. Arizona, Mapp v. Ohio, and Gideon v. Wainwright are all related to which of the following? (5 points)
pogonyaev

Answer:

criminal investigation and court procedures

Explanation:

The common factor between the Mapp vs Ohio, Miranda vs Arizona and Gideon vs Wainwright was that they were all criminal investigation and court procedures.

In the Miranda vs Arizona case, the court ruled that the incriminating statements made by the accused were only admissible in court if the police informed the suspect of his Miranda rights first.

In the Mapp vs Ohio case, the court ruled that evidence obtained through violation of the Fourth Amendment which has to do with unlawful searches and seizures were not admissible in court.

During the Gideon vs Wainwright case, the court ruled that the states were bound by the Sixth Amendment to produce a lawyer for an accused if he cannot afford one.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Defining characteristics of a nation-state
    15·2 answers
  • What does the phrase "the dominant primordial beast was strong in buck" mean?
    6·2 answers
  • What was john locke known for?
    7·2 answers
  • Some scholars believe that before they can have true civilization, societies must develop
    11·2 answers
  • Why do people refer to regions rather than continents explain how you got the answer.
    15·1 answer
  • How would colonist boycotts of British goods be harmful to Britain’s economy
    9·1 answer
  • What is one example of the Socratic method in practice today?
    9·1 answer
  • What is Imperialism? Why did nations engage in this practice?
    14·2 answers
  • How do you think the 9/11 attacks changed The United States?
    14·1 answer
  • why did Baptist Minister Garrison frazier believe that land was what African-Americans wanted most after the war​
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!