Hello. This question is incomplete. The complete question is:
Polls show that the country overwhelmingly agrees that we need a high-speed rail system to connect the east and west coasts and everything in between. The president schedules a Cabinet meeting to discuss whether or not the project can be included in the federal budget. Given this information, which non-permanent Cabinet member would most likely be asked to attend the meeting?
a. secretary of transportation b. secretary of the interior c. chairperson of the Council of Economic Advisors d. director of the Office of Budget and Management
Answer:
d. director of the Office of Budget and Management
Explanation:
Even without being part of the Ganinete responsible for the railway system, it is important that the Director of the Budget and Management Office is invited to participate in the meeting, because he/she will be essential to assess the availability of economic resources for this project, as soon as they evaluate all the expenditure and gain that the government would have, being able to conclude if the project is economically viable or what modifications must be made so that the project becomes more economical and within the limits of government expenditure.
Answer:
*Eliminate whoever* cyberbullies
Explanation:
<em>L</em><em>e</em><em>t</em><em> </em><em>your</em><em> </em><em>eye</em><em> </em><em>be</em><em> </em><em>kept</em><em> </em><em>on</em><em> </em><em>my</em><em> </em><em>child</em><em>.</em><em>.</em><em>.</em><em>.</em><em>.</em><em>.</em>
Remark
This is a good question to mull over. What exactly are you told? Multiple choice doesn't allow you to stray much from that point. The main point is that she was illuminated from the light coming from the open door. It doesn't suggest we go hunting for what that might mean.
However the commentary does (that's your second sheet). It defines dark. It defines light and it defines blind and bland.
With this set of comments in mind, let's choose an answer.
A is likely true. But is that what we are told? The commentary hints at it, but we have not gotten into the narrator's head. Not yet. We'll come back to this if we have to.
He's not confused. Not here anyway. I wouldn't pick B.
C Maybe. That's more hinted at in the commentary than it is in the single sentence we have to work with. I would say it is too big a leap. I wouldn't choose it.
D since this is mentioned in the commentary, it can't be eliminated.
E we have no hint of this, even if it is true, which it could be.
So what are we left with?
A and D with a small nod (very small) to C.
I think I'd go with A, but I wouldn't be the least surprised if it was one of the other 2. If you feel that D is the better answer, go with it. This is a coin tossing time.
