1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Dima020 [189]
3 years ago
12

Issues between morality and science?

English
1 answer:
worty [1.4K]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

i think it is science doesn't believe

Explanation:

rdgccgvghgfghg

You might be interested in
What is the purpose of a text trailer?
OverLord2011 [107]

Answer:

to provide a critique

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Music
Lubov Fominskaja [6]

Answer:

Cause and effect

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Please feed the dog.
Ivan

Answer: no

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Kalani and lael are students who have been comparing the total kinetic energy of an iceberg to an ice cube
Nitella [24]

Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:

Kalani and lael are students who have been comparing the total kinetic energy of an iceberg to an ice cube

Kalani’s Argument:  My claim is that an iceberg has more total kinetic energy (thermal energy) than an ice cube. This is because even though an iceberg is about the same temperature as an ice cube, it is also much larger, so it is made of a lot more molecules. For this reason, an iceberg will have more total kinetic energy (thermal energy) than an ice cube.

Lael's Argument: An iceberg has more total kinetic energy (thermal energy) than an ice cube because it is larger and made of more molecules. This matters because molecules move, and moving things have kinetic energy, so each molecule adds its kinetic energy to the total. Since the iceberg and the ice cube are around the same temperature, the fact that the iceberg has extra molecules means that it will have more total kinetic energy (thermal energy).

Which argument is more convincing?

Answer:

Kalani's argument is more convincing.

Explanation:

Lael says that the fact that Icebrg has extra molecules means that it has greater kinetic energy and this is not true, since the kinetic energy is greater in bodies and objects that have greater speed. In addition, speed increases as a body has greater mass. In this case, we can consider Kalani's argument as more convincing, since she related the kinetic energy to the mass of the iceberg.

7 0
2 years ago
In "The Story of Baba Abdalla," why does Baba Abdalla have every person who gives him alms give him a box on the ear?
Rzqust [24]
To remind him of his foolishness and greed.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Read these lines from "An Open Boat" and answer the question. An Open Boat by Alfred Noyes See - quick - by that flash, where th
    14·2 answers
  • Which option is a characteristic of an unreliable narrator?
    15·1 answer
  • When did ancient stories begin to be recorded in written format?
    11·1 answer
  • Dr. Fletcher opens the envelope
    7·2 answers
  • Which group lists all the abstract nouns in this sentence?
    5·1 answer
  • Read the dialogue from James Joyce's "Araby."
    11·1 answer
  • Tone and mood of tortilla sun​
    5·2 answers
  • What does the third level refer to?​
    12·1 answer
  • Which sentence from Fever 1793 reveals a first-person point of view?
    7·2 answers
  • 2. Find the right conjunction. "We started moving _______ he took his foot off the brake."
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!