Answer:
d
Step-by-step explanation:
i know it's rhe right answer
Answer:
There is enough evidence to say that the true average heat output of persons with the syndrmoe differs from the true average heat output of non-sufferers.
Step-by-step explanation:
We have to perform a hypothesis test on the difference between means.
The null and alternative hypothesis are:

μ1: mean heat output for subjects with the syndrome.
μ2: mean heat output for non-sufferers.
We will use a significance level of 0.05.
The difference between sample means is:

The standard error is

The t-statistic is

The degrees of freedom are

The critical value for a left tailed test at a significance level of 0.05 and 16 degrees of freedom is t=-1.746.
The t-statistic is below the critical value, so it lies in the rejection region.
The null hypothesis is rejected.
There is enough evidence to say that the true average heat output of persons with the syndrmoe differs from the true average heat output of non-sufferers.
Answer:
Write the expression as:"
70
+ 2
* 2
− 18a " ;
______________________________________________________or; write as:
______________________________________________________ "
70.32 + (2.1) * (2.7) − 18a " ;
______________________________________________________To simplify:
______________________________________________________ Using "PEDMAS" (the "order of operations") ;
the "multiplication" comes first;
So: → "(2.1) * (2.7) = 5.67 " .
And rewrite:
______________________________________________________ " 70.32 + 5.67 − 18a " .
Now: " 70.32 + 5.67 = 75.99 " ;
So, we can the final simplified expression as:
______________________________________________________ "
75.99 − 18a " ;
or; write as: "
75
− 18a " .
______________________________________________________
Answer:
Answer and explanation with steps are in the following attachments
Step-by-step explanation:
This system of equations is consistent and independent, because there is only one solution. the answer is C