1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
tensa zangetsu [6.8K]
3 years ago
9

What if the President could fire justices of the Supreme Court if he didn’t like a ruling they made?

History
1 answer:
valina [46]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

It could cause a bias for they are supposed to be politically neutral.  If the President could fire them, then who can say he can't hire them, so he could put lets say republican extremists in the supreme court if he so desired, this would basically mess up the system.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
The texas legislature can override the governor's general veto with a ______ vote in each house.
PilotLPTM [1.2K]
With a 2/3 vote. If both the Texas Senate and the Texas House get two thirds of votes to override, they can override a veto and nobody can do anything about it. It's similar even in the congress of the federation, not just a Texas thing. This is called a large majority and it's that many people because it's usually about serious things that can't just be decided easily.
8 0
3 years ago
Which prominent issue in the American colonies symbolized the core of their dispute with England?
mrs_skeptik [129]
The correct answer is A. Taxation without representation
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was an open door policy
ale4655 [162]

The Open Door policy was a statement of principles initiated by the United States in 1899 and 1900. It called for protection of equal privileges for all countries trading with China and for the support of Chinese territorial and administrative integrity.

hope this helps :)

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Hou did the Warren Court's decisions generally affect the rights of
Llana [10]

Answer:

The Warren Court was the period from October 5, 1953, to June 23, 1969, during which Earl Warren served as chief justice of the Supreme Court of the United States. Along with the Marshall Court of Chief Justice John Marshall from 1801 to 1835, the Warren Court is remembered as one of the two most impactful periods in American constitutional law. Unlike any court before or since, the Warren Court dramatically expanded civil rights and civil liberties, as well as the powers of the judiciary and the federal government.

Explanation:

hope i helped

5 0
3 years ago
Just prior to WWI, the colonial powers were primarily seeking A. raw materials B. slaves C. export Markets D. exotic spices
prisoha [69]

I would say raw materials but don't quote me on it lol


5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How was racism evident even in the Abolitionist movement, and what steps did some Abolitionists take to fight racism in American
    11·1 answer
  • What was accomplished by members of the 2nd continental Congress during their meeting in Philadelphia
    15·1 answer
  • Conquerors saw themselves as parents and their colonies as children True False
    13·2 answers
  • The continental blank established a mechanism for suspending trade with britain
    15·1 answer
  • Which countries had the least say in the Treaty of Versailles and how were they affected by it?
    13·1 answer
  • What do you mean by wood's despatch ?
    12·1 answer
  • One function of both the north erican free trade agreement and the eurpean union is to
    5·1 answer
  • Dorothea Dix was an educator who first saw the connection between
    11·2 answers
  • Why french they could not forget about samora tuore resistance six point​
    7·1 answer
  • The sacrifices that dancers have to make (including financial and personal ones) are almost an accepted part
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!