All categories

3 years ago

What if the President could fire justices of the Supreme Court if he didn’t like a ruling they made?

History

1 answer:

valina [46]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

It could cause a bias for they are supposed to be politically neutral. If the President could fire them, then who can say he can't hire them, so he could put lets say republican extremists in the supreme court if he so desired, this would basically mess up the system.

Explanation:

You might be interested in

Which statement from Martin Luther's 95 Theses do you feel had the greatest impact on the Protestant Reformation? Explain your r

poizon [28]

Answer:

Fifty years ago my friends and I had a party where we read and toasted each of the 95 theses so at one point I certainly read ’em all, though granted the effect of all those shots, I don’t recall the higher numbered ones very well. In any case, don’t think the theses, which are focused on indulgences, are a very clear statement of Luther’s theology. After all, in 1517, Luther didn’t realize he was instigating the Reformation; and the full statement of salvation by faith alone and the rest came later. What made the Theses matter wasn’t doctrinal. One of the major factors in the Reformation was resentment of the financial burden the Roman church put on the German people—the indulgences were sold to finance the building of Saint Peter’s cathedral. Whatever purely religious motives the German princes had in supporting Luther’s rebellion, they definitely liked the idea of not shipping money off to Rome. The prospect of secularizing the monasteries was mighty welcome as well. No princely support, no Reformation.

I’m definitely going for thesis 62 — “The true treasure of the church, is the most holy gospel of the glory and grace of God”

Rome and the Reformers both taught that a man is justified by God’s work of grace, but, it is all important to see the real contrast between the Roman and the Reformation faiths. ROME taught — justification by God’s work of grace in man emphasizing the work of God in us and our co-operation with that work.

The REFORMATION — taught that man is Justified by God’s work of grace in Christ, emphasizing what God does for us in Christ, without our co-operation.

Explanation:

that^^

6 0

3 years ago

What do a government based on a parliamentary system and a government based on a democratic system have in common?

mamaluj [8]

Both have the 3 branches of government

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

In your opinion, is each of the following procedures likely to be considered medically necessary by a payer’s healthcare claims

Gre4nikov [31]

complete question:

Hi! the question is incomplete here is the complete question

In your opinion, is each of the following procedures likely to be considered medically necessary by a payer’s health care claims examiner? Why?

1.Diagnosis: deviated septum; Procedure: nasal surgery.

2.Diagnosis: mole on a female patient’s cheek, questionable nature; Procedure: surgical removal and biopsy.

3.Diagnosis: male syndrome hair loss; Procedure: implant hair plugs on the scalp.

4,Diagnosis: probable broken wristProcedure: comprehensive full-body examination, with complete set of lab tests, chest x-ray, and ECG.

5.Susie was seen in her dermatologist’s office because she wanted to remove a blemish on her arm not considered malignant and doing her no harm.

Is the removal medically necessary and is it likely to be covered by health insurance?

Answers: before we get to answers first we need to understand the basic of health insurance that is "health insurance only deals with the health issues that are required to deal with for maintaining the health of a patient

1.answer is yes

explanation: because deviated septum is only corrected by surgery and there is no other way to deal with it, and it is a proper health issue requiring to be dealt with to maintain patient's health, this is why deviated septum will be covered by health insurance

2.The answer is yes

explanation: moles can be non-cancerous and cancerous which could be dangerous for the patient, so it is necessary to deal with the mole and treat it for the better health of the patient

3.The answer is no

explanation: this wouldn't be covered because hair loss in males is a cosmetic issue, not a life-threatening issue. only the life-threatening issues are covered

4.The answer is no

explanation: if a patient breaks hi's wrist only the wrist needs to be treated and examined not he whole body, the affected area is the body gets to be treated only, so the broken wrist would be examined by x-ray

and other necessary treatments for the broken wrist would be covered

5. The answer is no

explanation: Susie is in no dangerous health condition, the blemish she wants to be removed is not harmful or threatening to her life, and health insurance doesn't cover any issue that doesn't concern with the health of the patient, therefore the insurance will not cover the treatment of removing the blemish on her arm

7 0

3 years ago

Which of these statements describes nativism? Check all the boxes that apply.

NISA [10]

The correct answers are as followed:

Nativists viewed immigrants as a cultural and economic threat- This is due to the fact that many immigrants were willing to work for lower wages than American citizens.

Nativists didn't believe immigrants could adopt US cultures and values. - Many Americans feared that the nice communities developing in cities like New York would only continue to feed these immigrants "refusal" to adapt American ideas.

Nativists pressued politicians to limit immigration- The nativists were successful in this, as the federal government passed the Immigration Act of 1924 which limited immigration.

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

In 1806 who left St. Louis and explored along the Arkansas river as far as the Rocky Mountains.

Digiron [165]

Answer:

Zebulon Pike

Explanation:

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers