Answer: It perpetuates the two-party system because minor parties do not attract a wide enough range of supporters to win.
Explanation:
The United States may be a democracy but it is one that is run by two parties. Minor parties do not have the reach, support or financing to challenge the great Republican and Democratic parties which is why in other to get enough votes to get into the major offices, one simply must belong to one of the two parties.
This is what the scenario above depicts. The plurality system assigs electoral votes to the candidate with the highest vote in the state and with the Reds and the Blues having support too wide to surmount, the system favors them and perpetuates their dominance.
Yes because reactionary crimes can be seen as less "evil" and crimes done out of reaction may have a meaning behind them thats not as bad as if it were done out of fun or enjoyment. An example is having to hurt someone to protect yourself or being in a position where you have protect others.
The answer is D. an equal distance with an equal amount of force.
This is because the two cylinders have the same diameter and the liquid inside them will not compress. So when one of the pistons (both pistons are also equal size) is pressed, the same amount of liquid is moved from one to another.
Answer:
Western Europe
Explanation:
Western Europe was the only relevant answer for the 18th century, everything dealing with Africa and Asia was in the pas like in the 1300s
An original criticism is that Kantian ethics is said to be doomed to be nothing or empty and also rigidly same in terms of its prescriptions and it is one where the complaints cannot be seen as true.
<h3>What is the good thing according to Kant?</h3>
We need to look into them on equal moral ground based on the will that is behind their actions.
The only thing that is good and one that is without qualification is said to be good will and that was what Kant says and this is what i agree with.
Hence, An original criticism is that Kantian ethics is said to be doomed to be nothing or empty and also rigidly same in terms of its prescriptions and it is one where the complaints cannot be seen as true.
Learn more about criticism from
brainly.com/question/2947946
#SPJ1
