Answer:
In Schenck v. United States, the Supreme Court <u><em>ruled that bans on dangerous speech were constitutional.</em></u>
Explanation:
In the 1919 Supreme Court case of Schenck v. the United States, the court deemed the actions of Charles Schenck and Elizabeth Baer as unconstitutional. It deemed them criminals for trying to obstruct the government's drafting of men for war and that it is an act against the security of the nation.
This case revolves around the claim that the obstruction of Schenck and Baer's free speech was unconstitutional and they have the right to express their opinions. But the court insisted that since the leaflets they distributed were against national security, the First Amendment doesn't apply to them.
Thus, the correct answer is the second option.
no jose's attempt to stop his clients behavior would not work cause his client already said that he has no interest in changing his behaviors and also he is enjoying it
Since not all the women have been asked (it's impossible, it would take too much time and be too expensive), we can only have an estimate - it's around 50%, or half the women.
The various statistics, depending on the county and a survey are between 40% and 60% - so that is the correct answer.
But as I said, depending on the sample and the source, that number can slightly vary.
In Schenck v. the United States (1919), the Supreme Court ruled that criticism of the draft was NOT protected by the First Amendment, because it created a clear and present danger to American interests.
- In the Schenk v. US case, which concerns the freedom of speech issue, Schenk urged Americans to forgo the World War I draft.
- The Supreme Court concluded in Schenck v. the United States that the First Amendment did not apply to criticism of the draft because it posed a clear and present danger to American interests.
- The U.S. Supreme Court heard a First Amendment challenge to federal legislation on free speech grounds for the first time in this case.
Learn about more Supreme Court here
brainly.com/question/18228641
#SPJ4
