The answer to the question is C
Answer:
Consequential damage
Explanation:
Consequential damage is the damages that are specific and that damages are not occurred due to an incident but occurred by the consequences of an incident.
For example, a car drive met with an accident when seeing another car accident during passing the second car. so we cannot say that the second car is responsible for the first car accident. It is the indirect result of the first car accident.
We can say that it is a result of indirect consequences.
<u><em>Types of consequential damages are;
</em></u>
The Sixth Amendment is the correct answer, not the 5th.
The Sixth Amendment requires a speedy trial with an impartial jury wherein you are allowed to face your accusers and hear the evidence that is being presented against you.
Answer:
B. How local population numbers of rare native fish species have been changing since the wildlife officials started paying recreational fishers to catch northern snakeheads
Explanation:
First discovered several years ago in North American lakes and rivers, the northern snakehead is a nonnative fish with no local predators. To keep the northern snakehead's population from growing, for the past three years wildlife officials have been paying recreational fishers for each northern snakehead they catch. In this way, the officials hope to stop the northern snakeheads from eliminating rare native fish species.
To evaluate the likelihood that the wildlife officials' plan will succeed, it would be most useful to determine which of the following
Only option B fit in the scenario explained;how local population numbers of rare native fish species have been changing since the wildlife officials started paying recreational fishers to catch northern snakeheads.This option helps to give more insight into the current plan which is being implemented and relates local population numbers of rare native fish species to the plan
