<span>One of the most persuasive tools the governor has is the threat of veto. This is very helpful because a threat of a veto will change the outlook of a bill long before it is presented to the President of the United States.</span>
The answer to this would be C. so your answer is Stock
C.Stock because the more stock u have the higher you are
When capital adequacy line is equal to the savings per worker function then "normal expected returns to investor".
<h3>What is
capital adequacy/requirement ratio?</h3>
The capital adequacy ratio (CAR) gauges a bank's level of capital retention in relation to its level of risk. The CAR of banks must be monitored by national regulators in order to ascertain how well it can withstand an acceptable amount of loss.
The components of capital adequacy are-
- The Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR) aims to ensure that banks have an adequate amount of capital to safeguard depositors' funds.
- (Tier 1 Capital + Tier 2 Capital) / Risk-Weighted Assets is the calculation for CAR.
- The BIS's capital standards have tightened up in recent years.
- By reducing the likelihood of bank insolvency, capital adequacy ratios promote the effectiveness and stability of a country's financial system.
- A bank with a high capital adequacy ratio is typically thought to be secure and likely to fulfill its financial obligations.
The principle of capital adequacy are-
- High-quality and loss-absorbing capital are both necessary.
- The Basel III criteria for common stock, along with supplementary tier 1 and tier 2 capital, are applied to establish the quality of capital, with retained earnings being the most important factor.
To know more about the capital requirement, here
brainly.com/question/13676980
#SPJ4
Answer:
-When a plaintiff attempts to gain "home-court advantage" by fling his lawsuit in a courthouse close to his place of business
Explanation:
Forum shopping is the act of filling a lawsuit in a courthouse in which the plaintiff believes is likely to provide the most favorable outcome.
Forum shopping is a practice that occurs when filling a lawsuit, therefore a defendant is not able to practice forum shopping.
It is fair to assume that a plaintiff's place of business is likely to provide him the most favorable outcome.