Answer:
Humans often use language, the most powerful symbol, to take part in cultural transmission —that is, to share what they know, think, and experience.
Explanation:
<u>Language is one of the most important aspects of human life and experience. </u>It can be expressed in many forms, orally, written, signally, tactile, etc. and it always uses a set of various symbols in different forms.
Language is one of the main qualities of humans as intelligent species, and <u>its sharing, transmission, and development are in charge of developing civilizations</u>. Thanks to the language, people could finally share and develop their ideas, values, and knowledge. With this, they became more intelligent and progressed, managing to increase the improvement of the society.
Answer:
A.the supply of water to land or crops to help growth, typically by means of channels.
B. he process of washing out an organ or wound with a continuous flow of water or medication.
Explanation:
I didnt know which one you wanted so here you go have a nice day.
<span>The example in the textbook of Paul English of kayak.com altering an existing open-office seating arrangement by using new employees to change existing seating patterns is an example of behavioral science research.
He wants to change these seating patterns so as to see how it will affect the behaviors of other employees.
</span>
Answer: The pundit is using a NATIONAL DEFENSE ARGUMENT to justify the trade restriction.
Explanation: National defense argument is when someone is using the security of the nation to defend his argument, to be very important as the security of the nation is very important.
This type of argument always tends to use the fallacy of red herring to convince his audience about his argument. The argument sounds to be important as it used red herring to relate it's point to the security of the nation during wartime.
The pundit politician has used the fallacy of red herring to relate it's reason of increment in the tariff of semiconductor importation, to the security of the nation during war times. Therefore this is a national security argument.
Answer:
Explanation:
Open-source innovation has not revolutionized and software and biotech industries. It completely changes the way that we think about creativity. To do something new we don't have to do something new we an existing or emerging form, made available through access and do something new with them. This promotes democracy in the innovation game, with open source services against persons or groups or against field or endeavors. The new open-source landscape is a vastly fertile one, with countless possibilities for growth, but its vastness and freedom can also overwhelming.
<u>Here are three key shifts:
</u>
- Passive recipients to active co-creator
- Our culture and our system for customers and emerging opportunities
- Own and protect to share and expand
