There are three steps
1 rearrange the equation so "y" is on the left and everything else is on the right
2 plot the "y=" line (make it a solid line for y< or y> and a dashed line for y< or y>)
3 shade above the line for a "greater than" (y> or y>) line under that or below the line for a less than (y< or y< line under it)
Answer:
-2
Step-by-step explanation:
m=
1. Yes they are congruent. You translate AB to move it over to CD. Specifically, shift 2 units to the right.
2. No, they are not congruent. QR is longer than MN. Congruent segments must be the same length.
3. No, they are not congruent. At first glance, they seem to be congruent after translation and reflection. However, XY is longer than UV, and those legs should be the same length for a pair of congruent triangles to be possible.
4. Yes they are congruent. You translate triangle ABC to move it over to triangle DEF (shift 1 to the left, 3 down).
X subtracted from y means y-x
2w+4 subtracted from 3w+6= (3w+6)-(2w+4)
don't forgett to diestribute invisible -1
-(2w+4)=-1(2w+4)=-2w-4
so
3w+6-2w-4=
3w-2w+6-4=
1w+2=
w+2
If you post lots of pictures of you partying and doing drugs then companies will probably think you aren't a very good person and will probably not hire you
