The question above wants to know your opinion on NATO's involvement in the conflicts between Russia and Ukraine. For this reason, I cannot answer this question, but I will show you how to answer it.
First, you should think about NATO's attitudes during this conflict and whether or not you agree with it. For that, it will be necessary that you research the conflict and the attitudes that NATO has taken about it.
During this research, you should identify the consequences of NATO's decision and whether or not it helped in the establishment and lack of resolution of the conflict.
Once you've determined all this, you can write this answer.
<h3>Response structure</h3>
- Show your opinion on NATO's position in the conflict between Ukraine and Russia.
- Show the reasons that created this opinion.
- Show what consequences you believe NATO had in the conflict.
More information about NATO is at the link:
brainly.com/question/1968939
A group of tourists have decided to hike.. has doesn’t make sense to me or makes sense in this sentence - hope this helps!
You should only convert a noun to a verb when it serves the goals of clarity and precise language. For example, it's much easier to say, "the leader" than say, "the person who led us." But other times, conversion might not work as well. For example, if you're describing an alcoholic, describing the person as a drinker might provide less information than simply referring to him as an alcoholic or saying he likes to drink alcohol. To add on, Many suffixes can be added to verbs to change them to nouns. Examples include adding -er as in runner, adding -tion as in action or adding -ade as in blockade. You might also use -ment as in merriment or -ant as it's used in defendant. Check a dictionary to determine whether the suffix you're adding constitutes a real word. If it doesn't, you'll need to clearly note that you're using a manufactured word or find a way to convey your meaning without converting a verb to a noun.
The Answer is B because that answer can create an image in your head from reading it
Answer:
O A. That the army is one part of the government.
Explanation:
In his essay Civil Disobedience, Henry David Thoreau wrote that people have the right to protest and reject 'unjust' laws that are made by governments if it destroys or hurts the rights of men. This essay sparked a huge outrage due to its support of the citizen's overrule of a government if they find it unjust or unfair for the whole people.
In his statement <em>"the standing army is only an arm of the standing government"</em>, Thoreau meant to say that the army is just one part of the government. They are like an arm, a part of the whole institution of the government which in itself is not a separate entity. It is just a part of the government like the arm is part of the human body.
Thus, the correct answer is option A.
