I think they can, because depending on how much the person has to offer it can provide tough facts for political viewpoints.
Answer:
1. India was formed with the basic premise of UNITY by Equality of rights.The constitution Assembly, bench Fixed by easing out the then Governor Genearal and bringing in place a Urdu Hindi Speaker to cast deciding vote forHindi/Urdu ,ruined the Unity of the Country by trying to have UNIFORMITY by declaring PakiSTAN’s National language of URDU as official language of India by terming that spoken Urdu as Hindi.and trying to form a URDUHINDI millatsociety
2. Hinduism because it has around 966 million adherents as of 2011.
3. The family is an important foundation that plays a key role in the lives of half of the Indians in India. As a collectivistic society, Indians often highlight loyalty and interdependence. ... These large multigenerational families can also be essential to providing economic security to an individual.
Explanation:
This could help you
https://prezi.com/t7qmpi9mhz_p/roles-of-menwomen-and-children-of-the-mikmaq-tribe/
Answer:
What can you predict in someone's situation (from your point of view) that made them act a certain way? (read last paragraph for shorter explanation)
-
The Correspondent Inference Theory is a psychological model which is used to explain how people infer (predict) the disposition (characteristics) of another person based on that person’s actions, regardless of what the action achieved or any situational factors. Thus, it is an observer attribution model and not a motivational model. It was first proposed by Edward Jones and Keith Davis in 1966
Explanation:
Overall, the question is asking you to recall a memory of watching or observing someone's behavior to see if their reasons for behaving as such were voluntary or involuntary. For example, a waiter at a restaurant. They are polite to you, take your orders, and serve you, but they have to because their job requires them to. The purpose of the theory was to explain why people make the decisions they do; because they want to, or they have to.
example, there is someone speeding at 70 MPH and the limit is 45. You may assume they are in a hurry, or they just want to speed just because. That is until you make an observation as to why they may be speeding. If you can find an answer to this via experience, you will have a simple answer. Any example of behavior will work, such as people being rude to you, or being nice. What can you predict in their situation from your point of view that made them act like that?
+ The attribution theory's purpose also connects to how people explain the cause of behavior and situations... I.e, is someone angry because they are bad-tempered or because something bad happened ? the whole point in your answer should explain an encounter and know the reason why the other person acted the way they did.
Answer:
Correctional Services Corp. v. Malesko, 534 U.S. 61
Explanation:
key issue that was the main point of the case is correctional service corporation.
Correctional service corporation - it is a strategy initiated by the federal government in order to manage and secure facilities that main function is to correct the offender by providing them a treatment, training and education program.
There are three main models of prison on which correction program works that is medical, community and crime, prevention model.
