A. Is the answer. Other 3 things are completed much earlier.
The U.S. Bill of Rights owes a debt to the Virg/inia Declaration of Rights (written by George Mason in 1776) and the English Bill of Rights (1689), as well as natural rights writings from the Age of Enlightenment and foundational English political texts like the Magna Carta (1215).
This is further explained below.
<h3>What is
the English Bill of
Rights?</h3>
Generally, Following the fall of King James II, William III and Mary II jointly ruled England and enacted the English Bill of Rights into law in 1689. Specific constitutional and civil rights were enumerated in the law, which finally granted Parliament control over the monarchy.
In conclusion, The Virg/inia Declaration of Rights written by George Mason in 1776, the English Bill of Rights written in 1689, works from the Age of Enlightenment pertaining to natural rights, and earlier English political documents such as the Magna Carta were all sources of inspiration for the United States Bill of Rights (1215).
Read more about the English Bill of Rights
brainly.com/question/20986147
#SPJ1
The primary source of law the supreme court would interpret to determine if the executive order was enforceable would be the constitution.
A constitution is a collection of guiding ideas or accepted precedents that serve as the foundation for a polity, organisation, or other sort of body's legal system and frequently specify how that institution is to be governed.
A written constitution is said to be one that contains these principles in a single legal document or group of legal papers; a codified constitution is one that contains all of these principles in a single comprehensive document. A significant example of an uncodified constitution is the United Kingdom's constitution, which is instead contained in various basic Acts of a legislature, legal decisions, or treaties.
Learn more about constitution here:
brainly.com/question/19411179
#SPJ4
Answer:
B. No fallacy
Explanation:
First of, we need to know what a fallacy is. A fallacy is a mistaken belief, especially one based on unsound arguments.
A sound argument is an argument in which the truth in the premises are used to deduce the conclusions. While an unsound argument, makes use of premises that are not true.
With these, we can determine if the argument in the question was a sound argument. If it was, it won't be fallacious.
There is truth in the fact that the slim tea made Barbara loose 15 pounds after taking it for the stated period of time.
Therefore, concluding that someone with the same buildup as Barbara will have the same results, after taking the tea for the same period of time, is logical and not fallacious. This is because the premise is a true fact that has been tested, and the conclusion was drawn from the true premise.
This makes the argument a sound argument, with no fallacy
