1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Dmitry_Shevchenko [17]
3 years ago
11

Nowwwwwwwwwwwsww eyghnfdg dr dr d dtrcytrytvryuvyvuvftyfvtyv ucrrcryvvirvirriirvvir crcuecrutrtucrctucrcrtu

History
1 answer:
vovangra [49]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

B

Explanation:

I dunno skjdjdididisosowsjdiiruuuh3hhbbejrifi993

You might be interested in
How did the loss of New Orleans impact the Confederacy?
barxatty [35]

Answer:

The loss of New Orleans affected the Confederacy because.

They were no longer able to use the Mississippi River to import and export supplies. Also the blockade made it even harder to import things like food ammo and guns also making the confederacy low on man power

i hope this helps

5 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is true about using government sources in your research?
rosijanka [135]
I think the answer would be D. because all of the above are true.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How were Nathaniel bacon and John Peter Zenger similar
musickatia [10]
They had both protested/sided against their government
8 0
3 years ago
In a well-developed essay, explain whether the benefits of projects to dam rivers in the Columbia Basin have outweighed their co
mrs_skeptik [129]

Answer:

Yes.

Explanation:

Yes, the benefits of projects to dam rivers in the Columbia Basin have outweighed their cost because these projects provides large benefits to the Columbia. They produces energy from these projects of dams as well as stored the water which can be used for agriculture purposes. So for producing energy from these dams, more money should be invested which increase and outweighed the cost. Due to these projects, more barren land can be converted into fertile agricultural land.

6 0
2 years ago
Think about Miranda v. Arizona and how it related
Ludmilka [50]

The correct answers are The Fifth and Sixth Amendment

Explanation:

Miranda v. Arizona was a legal case in 1966, in this, Ernesto Miranda accused of kidnapping and sexual abuse confessed during the interrogation, which led to a sentence of about 20 years. However, Miranda was never told he could have counsel or guidance of a lawyer, he could remain in silence, or his words would be used against him, which means he was not informed of his rights and the legal procedure was not followed. Due to this, the Supreme Court determined the trial and process had not been legal and a retrial was necessary.

Moreover, this decision was related to the fifth amendment that protects against self-incrimination including the right to not answer questions against oneself; as well as, the sixth amendment that establishes a public, speedy and fair trial should be guaranteed. Thus, this case addressed the fifth and sixth amendments.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why colosseum can last up to now
    14·1 answer
  • Iroquois us history definition
    5·1 answer
  • The government put immigration laws in place to…
    5·1 answer
  • When the president is managing the federal bureaucracy and its many programs and employees, he is acting as __________.
    8·1 answer
  • ¿donde vive Barack Obama ?
    9·1 answer
  • What is the climate of India and why is it called a subcontinent?
    7·1 answer
  • 10. The foundation of Aksum's wealth was based on
    8·2 answers
  • What city was the first capital of the United States? ...
    13·2 answers
  • (Argument why burning an American flag should be legal.
    9·1 answer
  • What do you need to leave at the cross?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!