The Constitution. Checks and balances throughout, separation of power in article one two and three.
Even is he existed, he is dead for centuries.
Explanation:
- The lack of credible material and written sources related to the narratives of Arthur and the Knights of the Round Table might suggest that historical Arthur did not even exist.
- Yet, the prevalence of Arthurian legends in European culture require particular caution from historians who address the issue.
- Depending on what attitude historians have about oral tradition, its significance and role, different, sometimes even completely opposite, answers are formed to the question of whether or not legends are based on truth.
- Some historians still deny the existence of King Arthur today, while others emphasize his enormous role in sixteenth-century British history.
- The truth, as usual, is probably somewhere in between, so today is the most accepted viewpoint that speaks in favor of the existence of Arthur, but only as a warlord or local lord of some of the disparate areas inhabited by the Celtic tribes - the Britons.
Learn more on King Arthur on
brainly.com/question/558817
brainly.com/question/2673644
#learnwithBrainly
Answer:
A <u>civilian</u> is a non-military person.
Answer:
Hindusim today is regarded nothing less then the progeny or an offshoot of brahmanism since hindus got their name from indus river on the banks of witch the aryans practised the vedas. hindus following the vedas and its brahman belief were as the first propellers of hinduism
sorry if it is wrong
They must be at least 35 years old and a resident of the United States for at least 14 years.
