He was the third president
he was a grand father of 12 grandchildren
he was an early archaeologist.<span>
</span>he kept pet mockingbirds.
<span>author of the Declaration of Independence
</span><span>he loved vanilla ice cream.
</span><span>he loved to write letters and read books.
</span>he went on a hungry strike and encouraged others to join him.
he was a family man.
he is remembered by putting him in<span> immortalized on the $2 bill, the nickel and as one of the figures of Mount Rushmore. </span>
Reconstruction resolved issue linked with inequality of slaves in the State which was the key issue behind the civil war
Reconstruction was the time following the American Civil War, when efforts were undertaken to provide African Americans full freedom and constitutional rights following liberation. The following major steps were taken :
- The Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendments to the Constitution were introduced during the Reconstruction era, permanently altering the governmental structure and the meaning of citizenship in the United States.
- In most of the South, public schooling was intoduced which was completely absent for Black pupils back then
- New job opportunities were created for blacks to provide them with economic equality.
- During the Reconstruction era, 16 African Americans served in Congress, including two U.S. Senators: Blanche K. Bruce and Hiram Rhodes Revels.
Learn more about Reconstruction here:
brainly.com/question/24761999
#SPJ10
Answer:
b
Explanation:
Such heavy reparations and punishment were reflected in The Treaty Of Versailles.
Answer:
Excommunication
Explanation:
I am not entirely sure of this, but this is what I was taught.
Have a great day!
Answer:
I mean debate can encourage new laws but if you have one side wishing for laws and the other against it. It will usually slow legislation which is entirely the purpose. But it depends on what view are you taking it from because th end result can be no legislation at all or even a relaxation of legislation in fact that's happened in some states. So it depends on the view and narrative you wish to push. because it can be a semblance of all but B. If you're a centrist you'd probably say this debate will encourage new laws but the whole point of not wishing for infringements upon one's rights means no new laws. If you wanted new laws then this debate is a waste of time but you're angering a large portion of the population because you seek not to listen to the statistics and thereby information one may have that may dissuade from the legislation. And if you look at D it can be so. If 2 cannot agree then rights will not be infringed upon. Unless the side with more representatives that disagrees with the right then such laws will be enacted. Yes, they can place new restrictions and there you can make the case it's unconstitutional and etc because well there is ground and a foundation laid upon there. But as far as an actual thing it'd be A I suppose. But I'd question the teacher because it depends on how one views a division. It can be either cooperative relationships that can be mended or an all or nothing if it's not my way then we will have conflict and it shall erupt. It all depends.
Explanation: