Answer:
See explanation
Step-by-step explanation:
f(x) = -2lx-3| +1
1.lx-3|==>Translate the basic absolute value graph f(x)=|x| 3 units to the right
2. -lx-3| ==> Flip the graph over the x-axis
3. -2lx-3| ==> Double all the y-coordinates of the graph
4. -2lx-3| +1 ==> Translate the graph 1 unit up
<h3>
Answer: Choice B</h3>
No, this is not a plausible value for the population mean, because 5 is not within the 95% confidence interval.
====================================================
Explanation:
The greek letter mu is the population mean. It has the symbol
which looks like the letter 'u' but with a tail at the front or left side.
The question is asking if mu = 5 is plausible if the researcher found the 95% confidence interval to be 5.2 < mu < 7.8
We see that 5 is <u>not</u> in that interval. It's a bit to the left of 5.2
Since mu = 5 is not in the interval, it's not a plausible value for the population mean.
Have we ruled it out with 100% confidence? No. Such a thing is not possible. There's always room for (slight) error. The researcher would need to do a census to be fully confident; however, such practices are very time consuming and expensive. This is the main reason why statistics is important to try to estimate the population with a sample.
Answer:
f
Step-by-step explanation:
because 24 inches is 2 feet and 2 yards is is 6 feet
Answer:
rfgcc ft v crytrcvrcvhtfvyrfftv ffg
Step-by-step explanation:
tgfgghcg gn v v