She is the founder and spokesperson of Mrs.Fields bakeries. Debbie Fields Rose (Rose is her married surname) has remained the face of Mrs. Fields whom has inspired millions of young entrepreneurs. Despite recieving much criticism and discouragment from her friends and family especially hence she had no formal education and no money to start a business of her own. All in all Debbie decided to ignore the discouragment she had felt and decided to follow her dreams and ignore the haters (lol) eventually she opened up a store in Palo Alto, California that would eventually be a $450 million leader of freshly baked cookies :)
A huge increase in the population combined with the industrial revolution led to a huge increase in crime. People migrated from rural areas to cities, there was a surplus of labor. The rise in crime was surprising for the authorities and it was difficult to control it, because ordinary people who were happy before were involved in crime. They were poor, unqualified people; for some, crime was an easy way to get to the money, and for other survival methods. Even children were engaged by adults, because it was easy to manipulate them, and they were paid less. As an emergence of crime, there is a drunkenness, which again contributes to a further increase in crime. People were unhappy because they did not have a job, they could not survive, they had solace in alcohol, become addicted, and then necessarily, began to steal to meet their needs, both basic and alcohol needs.
Probably because of Louis XIV.
The correct statement is that the argument over the slavery would never end.
<h3>What was the reaction of the people in the South in Scott v. Sandford case?</h3>
The people of the South were opposed to the decision made by the supreme court.
They had the the belief that the slavery would never end, despite it would spread rapidly.
Even people agreed that slavery had already spread.
Learn more about the Scott v. Sandford case here:-
brainly.com/question/12359809
#SPJ1
<span>Traveling west in the 1800s would have been fraught with danger, but depending on the area traveled to, it could have been relatively safe. The dangers would have been from wagon breakages and native attacks on lands opened up by the Homestead Act. Moving west through the railroads, though, might have been a bit safer since it would have been less likely that they would have been set upon by the natives in those areas.</span>
