They wanted to stay nurtral to make more money.
Answer:
1- McCulloch v. Maryland:
-The Second Bank of the United States was involved in the case.
-The Supreme Court ruled that a state could not tax a federal institution
2- Gibbons v. Ogden:
-The state of New York was involved in the case.
-The Supreme Court ruled that a state could not regulate commercial activities between states.
-A state-granted one company exclusive rights over the Hudson river.
Explanation:
1- McCulloch v. Maryland was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court in 1819, in which the state of Maryland was barred from levying a tax on federal banks operating in its territory. As a result, the principle of federalism triumphed over state rights, while the constitutional "Necessary and Proper Clause," which allows Congress to carry out certain actions not expressly stated in the Constitution but that appear to conform with those permitted activities, remained in effect.
2- Gibbons v. Ogden was a Supreme Court decision from 1824 that upheld the federal government's authority to control interstate trade. This is due to a dispute between New York and New Jersey, which was supposed to be settled by municipal courts but ended up breaching the Supreme Court's original authority and the states' right to equality.
North: Had a larger population, had a great industrial advantage, the north controlled the seas, the North had more troops to fight the war. the North had railroads, steamboats, roads, and canals for faster transport of supplies and troops.
South: The south was playing defense on their own territory, the South had better Generals who knew better how to fight, and the South could produce all the food it needed.
She lost in 1994 to George w. Bush despite painting herself as a reformists governor . The republicans have therefore controlled the Texas governorship for the period up to then which translates to two decades and four years.
Here is the correct answer of the given question above. The Dawes Act of 1887 marked a departure from the earlier Federal Indian policy by leading the conflicts <span>between new settlers and Indian tribes on the Great Plains. Hope this answer helps.</span>
