Answer:
the constitution outlined how this government would function
Explanation:
They point out that:
- it's good to have people who speak fluently more than one language ( can be used in international relations)
- bilingualism boosts cognitive development of individuals, studies show that non-native speakers of one language get better at it if they're not loosing contact with their own language (so teach both Spanish and English in southern US, not only English)
Strict scrutiny, moderate scrutiny, and logical basis scrutiny are three tests.
To evaluate the legitimacy of differential treatment based on a suspicious classification, a Strict scrutiny test is applied (race, ethnic origin, religion).
In free exercise clause cases, the court previously applied strict scrutiny more frequently, as in Sherbert v. Verner (1963) and Wisconsin v. Yoder (1972), but the Employment Division v. Smith decision altered the approach (1990).
When a plaintiff accuses the government of discrimination, the courts frequently use strict scrutiny. The law must have been carefully crafted to satisfy a "compelling governmental interest" and have been passed by the legislature in order to pass rigorous scrutiny.
A law impacting a fundamental right must have a compelling state purpose in order to pass under the Strict Scrutiny criterion. In order to accomplish the goal or interest of the government, the law must also be carefully crafted.
To know more about Strict Scrutiny refer to: brainly.com/question/11550284
#SPJ1
Answer:
Explanation:
The importance of individual dignity and private morality
The need to prevent people from forming mobs.
The creation of a Senate or legislature to write laws.
