1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
weeeeeb [17]
3 years ago
11

* When Rome fell, what was lost? explain in 5-7 sentences

History
1 answer:
Alexeev081 [22]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

When Rome fell an organized and centralized Empire that included most of Mediterranean disappeared. Common language, culture and language were also lost.

Explanation:

Roman Empire was the largest empire at the time, that was organized and centralized and spread across most of the known world at the time. Common language, religion and culture were established. It was the peak of the human development until then. But, when the Germanic tribes destroyed Rome, they destroyed the achievements of the Empire. They destroyed trade connection, they destroyed cities. Knowledge was lost. Schools disappeared. It was a large step back.

You might be interested in
What factors led to Robespierre becoming a dictator?
iren [92.7K]

Answer: Yes

Explanation: After an interregnum of shared power, Robespierre became dictator, and the Terror started in earnest.

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Develop four hypothesis of different ways to end the war with Japan. Be sure the suggestions are realistic and reflect the perio
Snezhnost [94]
One option can be a full military campaign based on sending soldiers to take Japanese territory. One advantage is that the number of killed civilians would be drastically lower while another would be that nuclear weaponry would not be used and would not destroy the environment. Disadvantage would be the high amount of soldier casualties and another can be possibly a very lengthy war effort.

Another option could be a complete blockade of Japan. Since it's an island, it would be possible to blockade it from all sides and wait for Japanese people to surrender since they wouldn't be able to sustain for long without importing things. One advantage would be preventing the death of Japanese civilians and preventing deaths of US troops. Disadvantages would be that might actually endure hardships and still wouldn't surrender, and another could be that they might fight like guerrillas and attack ships and American troops

Another option can be an allied assault in which the US could attack together with Soviets and split Japan like Germany. Advantage would be reduced amount of killed Japanese civilians and reduced amount of killed American troops. The disadvantage could be that a split Japan would be problematic like split Germany was because of Communism, and another could be that it would enable soviets to spread their influence even more throughout Asia

Fourth option could be having a demonstration of the power of nuclear weaponry somewhere safe. The United States could show what they are capable of in order to scare Japan into surrender. One advantage is that Japanese civilians would not be harmed and another can be that they would still show the world how strong the United States bombs are. One disadvantage could be that Japanese people might still not surrender since there were many who wanted to stay in the war even after the two nukes, and another disadvantage could be that Japan might began preparing for nuclear warfare since they would now know what awaits them

The best possible option could be as a recommendation the naval blockade. If a naval blockade was combined with bombardment of strategic military areas then Japan would inevitably surrender even though it would take a few months at least. It would cost a lot but it would save the lives of many people who didn't have to suffer because of their government.
5 0
3 years ago
What major point was Thomas Paine trying to make using the evidence in this passage?
algol [13]
<span>A The British army was thoroughly unprepared to take on the American colonists.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Can milk give you cancer?
kicyunya [14]

Explanation:Casein is the main protein in milk. There is no strong evidence to show this causes cancer in humans. Although dairy products contain hormones, this is very small compared to the amount produced naturally by the body. There is no strong evidence to show that hormones in milk could go on to cause cancer.

8 0
2 years ago
Birmingham, alabama, was chosen by civil rights activists as a site for major demonstrations in april 1963 because _____________
Verdich [7]
It was chosen by Civil Rights Activists as a site for major demonstrations in April 1963 because they considered it "the most segregated city" in America.
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How was the economic situation in the United States different than in European nations in the 1920s?
    12·1 answer
  • The North had many advantages over the South during the Civil War. For example, the North had more factories and railroads. How
    5·2 answers
  • Two roman ships went to London and Antioch. All things are being equal, but which will arrive first
    12·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST TO CORRECT ANSWER
    11·1 answer
  • Why did the colonies Write state constitutions, beginning in 1776?
    5·1 answer
  • Choose the word or phrase that best completes each sentence.
    8·1 answer
  • Identify the significance of the terms to the subject of the civil war ( a. tributary b. ironclad c. casualty
    10·2 answers
  • Jack in the Box or Carl's jr. will pick brainliest if whoever gets the one I like more
    11·1 answer
  • Why was that a problem with Voltaire?
    15·1 answer
  • Fill in the name of the correct participant of Trojan War.
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!