1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
OLga [1]
3 years ago
10

Give three reasons why some Americans supported the annexation (take over) of the Philippines by the United States.

History
1 answer:
Artemon [7]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Americans who advocated annexation evinced a variety of motivations: desire for commercial opportunities in Asia, concern that the Filipinos were incapable of self-rule, and fear that if the United States did not take control of the islands, another power (such as Germany or Japan) might do so.

You might be interested in
Select the correct text in the passage.
JulijaS [17]

<u>This portion of the text shows Hobbes supported an absolute ruler:</u>

  • <em>Men are continually in competition for honour and dignity . . . and consequently amongst men there ariseth on that ground, envy, and hatred, and finally war. ... No wonder if there be somewhat else required, besides [contract], to make their agreement constant and lasting; which is a common power to keep them in awe and to direct their actions to the common benefit. </em>
  • <em> The only way to erect such a common power, as may be able to defend them from the invasion of foreigners, and the injuries of one another . . . is to confer all their power and strength upon one man, or upon one assembly of men, that may reduce all their wills, by plurality of voices, unto one will.</em>

Further detail:

Thomas Hobbes published a famous work called Leviathan in 1651.  The title "Leviathan" comes from a biblical word for a great and mighty beast.  Hobbes believed government is formed by people for the sake of their personal security and stability in society.  In Hobbes' view, once the people put a king (or other leader in power), then that leader needs to have supreme power (like a great and mighty beast).    Hobbes' view of the natural state of human beings without a government held that people are too divided and too volatile as individuals -- everyone looking out for his own interests.  So for security and stability, authority and the power of the law needs to be in the hands of a powerful ruler like a king or queen.  And so people willingly enter a "social contract" in which they live under a government that provides stability and security for society.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
By 1500, ___________ supplied almost half the gold in Europe.. . . A. Africa. . . . B. India. . . . C. South America. . . . D. t
Akimi4 [234]

The correct answer is A) Africa.

By 1500, Africa supplied almost half the gold in Europe.

In the 1500s, gold was an abundant precious rock in West Africa. Indeed, there were many gold deposits that for the African tribes was nos considered very valuable...until the Europeans arrived and realize how much gold there was. Africans used to trade gold for salt because salt was much need for the conservation of food. European colonies were the ones that took much of the gold from the African colonies to sent it to their European monarchies.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Castle William, located on a Boston harbor island, functioned as a secret meeting place for the Sons of Liberty. True False
insens350 [35]

Answer:

false

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
What recognizes God as the ultimate authority in government and law
Minchanka [31]
It is the "Great Chain of Being"--derived from the thinking of Plato and Aristotle-- that recognizes God as the ultimate authority in government and law, and of course over all humans and animals. 
 
4 0
3 years ago
How did world war I affected the struggle against colonial rule in africa?​
enyata [817]

Answer:

World War I was the first time since the Berlin Conference of 1884 that European colonial powers fought each other on a large scale, and not over issues related to their respective colonies.

This situation implied a general weakening of the European powers, which neglected the affairs of their colonies to dedicate their efforts to solve the war and the well-being of their nations. Therefore, this caused the colonial powers to lose power in Africa, thus starting anti-colonial movements that deepened after the Second World War. In addition, in the war itself, many countries, such as Germany, lost their colonies to other nations, which caused the inhabitants of the colonies themselves to lose a sense of belonging to their colonizers.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which statement about the byzantine empire is not true?
    14·1 answer
  • How did the American Revolution inspire the French Revolution?
    13·2 answers
  • What were the objectives of the First Continental Congress? (Select all that apply.)
    9·2 answers
  • How did Roosevelt's use of presidential and federal power differ from that of earlier Presidents? Give two examples.
    8·1 answer
  • Blackshirts were the fascist military wing under the leadership of (Adolf Hitler/Benito Mussolini/Vladmir Lenin) while the Bolsh
    8·2 answers
  • 5. What were the risks involved in tenant farming and share cropping?
    12·2 answers
  • How do travel routes of today differ from the trade routes of classical era civilizations
    9·2 answers
  • How did the Orleans Parish school board respond to Judge J. Skelly Wright’s order to desegregate schools?
    8·1 answer
  • Social pros and cons of the transatlantic slave trade
    10·1 answer
  • What differences can you identify among the four major empires in the Islamic world of the 15th and 16th centuries?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!