1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Igoryamba
3 years ago
9

Question 15 of 23

English
1 answer:
skad [1K]3 years ago
4 0

Answer: A. Each skyscraper stood in silent witness of the city's crimes.

Explanation:

Personification is when you give a non-human thing a human characteristic.  The skyscrapers "stood in silent witness", and that is something that a non-living/non-human thing cannot do.

You might be interested in
Write a 3–4 paragraph essay in which you interpret and describe how Eliezer’s faith is affected by his experiences. Conclude you
jekas [21]

Eliezer’s struggle with his faith is a dominant conflict in Night. At the beginning of the work, his faith in God is absolute. When asked why he prays to God, he answers, “Why did I pray? . . . Why did I live? Why did I breathe?” His belief in an omnipotent, benevolent God is unconditional, and he cannot imagine living without faith in a divine power. But this faith is shaken by his experience during the Holocaust.



Initially, Eliezer’s faith is a product of his studies in Jewish mysticism, which teach him that God is everywhere in the world, that nothing exists without God, that in fact everything in the physical world is an “emanation,” or reflection, of the divine world. In other words, Eliezer has grown up believing that everything on Earth reflects God’s holiness and power. His faith is grounded in the idea that God is everywhere, all the time, that his divinity touches every aspect of his daily life. Since God is good, his studies teach him, and God is everywhere in the world, the world must therefore be good.



Eliezer’s faith in the goodness of the world is irreparably shaken, however, by the cruelty and evil he witnesses during the Holocaust. He cannot imagine that the concentration camps’ unbelievable, disgusting cruelty could possibly reflect divinity. He wonders how a benevolent God could be part of such depravity and how an omnipotent God could permit such cruelty to take place. His faith is equally shaken by the cruelty and selfishness he sees among the prisoners. If all the prisoners were to unite to oppose the cruel oppression of the Nazis, Eliezer believes, then maybe he could understand the Nazi menace as an evil aberration. He would then be able to maintain the belief that humankind is essentially good. But he sees that the Holocaust exposes the selfishness, evil, and cruelty of which everybody—not only the Nazis, but also his fellow prisoners, his fellow Jews, even himself—is capable. If the world is so disgusting and cruel, he feels, then God either must be disgusting and cruel or must not exist at all.



Though this realization seems to annihilate his faith, Eliezer manages to retain some of this faith throughout his experiences. At certain moments—during his first night in the camp and during the hanging of the pipel—Eliezer does grapple with his faith, but his struggle should not be confused with a complete abandonment of his faith. This struggle doesn’t diminish his belief in God; rather, it is essential to the existence of that belief. When Moshe the Beadle is asked why he prays, he replies, “I pray to the God within me that He will give me the strength to ask Him the right questions.” In other words, questioning is fundamental to the idea of faith in God. The Holocaust forces Eliezer to ask horrible questions about the nature of good and evil and about whether God exists. But the very fact that he asks these questions reflects his commitment to God.



Discussing his own experience, Wiesel once wrote, “My anger rises up within faith and not outside it.” Eliezer’s struggle reflects such a sentiment. Only in the lowest moments of his faith does he turn his back on God. Indeed, even when Eliezer says that he has given up on God completely, Wiesel’s constant use of religious metaphors undercuts what Eliezer says he believes. Eliezer even refers to biblical passages when he denies his faith. When he fears that he might abandon his father, he prays to God, and, after his father’s death, he expresses regret that there was no religious memorial. At the end of the book, even though he has been forever changed by his Holocaust experience, Eliezer emerges with his faith intact.



4 0
3 years ago
Please Answer this question
Sindrei [870]

Answer:

I think A

Explanation:

Because all the answers is about politics so overall A

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The sentence Dad brought presents for her and me is grammatically correct. True False
frez [133]
True because using the term her & me isn’t considered proper English, it’s supposed to say, Dad brought presents for her and l.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
"It was a low,dull,quick sound-much such a sound as a watch makes when enveloped in cotton.I gasped for breath,and yet the offic
Aneli [31]

Answer:

At the beginning, it is very soft and quiet, but then the text starts to get more aggressive.

Explanation: So, probably harsh of aggressive.

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
"Henry the Eight…used to marry a new wife every day, and chop her head off next morning. And he would do it just as indifferent
stiks02 [169]

Answer:

Huck seems indifferent to his own claim about the kings of the past and the present, their companion "king" included.

But in giving the story of Henry VIII to Jim, he meant to show that all kings are the same, be it past or present, real or fake king.

Explanation:

When Huck told Jim about Henry VIII in Chapter 23 of Mark Twain's "The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn", he did not seem to really believe it. But there is also no proof of his own disbelief of the story either. According to him, there is no such real difference in the kings of the past and the 'king' who's their companion.

In his description of Henry VIII, Huck seems to have a mild idea of many stories which he composed into one tale. He attributes Henry VIII with that of the king in the stories of One Thousand Nights, the historical Boston Tea Party and the Declaration of Independence. There is no such demarcation of story and history for him.

But whatever that may be, his claim seems to be that he wants to show how almost everyone, be it the kings of the past and the one they have as a companion, are all the same. Some lines after this passage, he said "<em>What was the use to tell Jim these warn’t real kings and dukes? It wouldn’t a done no good; and, besides, it was just as I said: you couldn’t tell them from the real kind</em>."

6 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • 50 POINTS!!!
    11·1 answer
  • Which sentence is correctly punctuated?
    7·2 answers
  • Select the correct text in the passage.
    12·2 answers
  • I know it’s c but I need to know why
    12·2 answers
  • When Zuoxin tells a new joke he heard to his roommate, his roommate laughs. Zuoxin keeps telling jokes, but his roommate (who ne
    7·2 answers
  • What was the purpose of the Declaration of Independence?
    13·1 answer
  • Summary of<br>the<br>poem<br>"Did i miss<br>anything​
    14·1 answer
  • Meaning of pop ( building )​
    14·1 answer
  • When reading a story, Scott feels certain he knows what is going to
    14·1 answer
  • Why going going through your friend phone can ruined your friendship without their permission? Pls tell me more and explain it d
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!