<span>the House impeached the president, but the Senate failed to remove him</span>
Engaged couples who live together prior to marriage are less likely to divorce, compared to nonengaged couples who cohabit.
An engagement is the agreement between two people to get married. The couple confirms their intention to wed by announcing their engagement. It is irrelevant whether the couples are of the same sex or not. The ritual of making a proposal is one that has been in use for many centuries. In the past, it was typical for the prospective husband to discuss the terms of the marriage with the father of the bride. Getting engaged is a formal declaration of intent to wed. When the marriage proposal is accepted, both spouses declare their intention to wed. Therefore, an engagement is nothing more or less than a couple's formal proclamation that they want to wed.
Engaged couples who live together prior to marriage are ________ likely to divorce, compared to nonengaged couples who cohabit.
Select one:
a. more
b. much less
c. equally
d. less
Learn more about engaged couples here:
brainly.com/question/14920185
#SPJ4
The correct answer is that "<span>has lost his anonymity.".
Shane was anonymous to the woman, who was carrying a large bag of groceries, until the bag fell and the woman looked at Shane directly and asked for help. In that scenario, when the woman looked at Shane and asked for help, Shane helped the woman since his anonymity </span>disappeared, when the woman noticed him and asked for his help.
<span>upholding standards
They want to show that they believe that child labor is wrong, and so the US refuses trade with another country because they use child labor
if they do not uphold standards, they can choose to get manufactured goods from another country (especially for cheaper prices)
So upholding standards is your best answer
hope this helps</span>
Better for whom? Germany's stable economy helps itself best if it keeps it's own currencies. This very question is what motivated the UK's Brexit.
However, if Germany and the UK, for example, deemed it beneficial to reactivate their membership in the EU on a temporary or, say, 'per their discretion' basis, for reason of providing and gaining greater purchasing power of goods from offshore regions, they should be given the latitude to pay into a large purchase under consideration by the remaining EU members.
This way, the stronger economies would not constantly be drained by the EU's poorer economies. This should not be the end of the story, however. The deutchmark and the pound would be better able to help EU from positions of strength if they decided to participate in a high volume, high value purchase. Adding the large German and British orders to the little orders from dozens of tiny countries would drive down offshore sellers' cost per unit, thus benefiting ALL the EU, Germany, and the UK.
