This is a question that refers to philosophical utilitarianism.
It is the search for the maximum happiness and pleasure, with the least possible suffering, but with an implicit moral question. When we are led to the feeling of pain or pleasure, we determine the way forward and know what is right or wrong.
In this way, it is possible that we are facing a moral dilemma. In our quest for happiness or minimizing our pain, our actions can impact others. That is, utilitarianism is essentially a teleological and consequentialist theory. Therefore, we must seek the impartial maximization of the happiness of all affected by our attitudes, regardless of the affective ties.
A fruit! jfjgfdgdfghdgfdj thats right
I believe the answer is: heterogeneous
According to piaget, heterogeneous morality refers to the perception of right or wrong without considering the intentions of all party involved.
in the example, Abby just automatically assume that she's wrong even if she does not understand the intentions of the cop.<span />
