Answer:
displacement
Explanation:
The defense mechanism of displacement is a form of psychological defense mechanism whereby an individual transfers his aggression or negative feelings of emotion from the original source of the negative emotion to a less threatening person or object that was not the source of the negative emotion but is likely to not bring negative consequences or repercussions. OK this way the individual is able to act out his emotional response freely with this person or object as demonstrated above
Answer:
B. A consul vetoed a law passed by the legislature
Explanation:
One branch is checking another. The consul is checking the legislature.
<span>The president that is responsible for initiating the conflict with the mexico and even the great Britain which also succeeded in negotiating treaties with both parties is James Knox Polk. He served as an American politician and also the 11th president in the United States and was known to cause a significant change in the United States in his presidency.</span>
Answer:
It is also known as the Servicemen's Readjustment Act of 1944. The G.I. Bill is for veterans of the World War II. The bill helped build hospitals, it made mortgages easily accessible with low interests, and provided stipends for tuition for veterans attending any type of school.
Answer:
Religion declines with economic development. In a previous post that rattled around the Internet, I presented a scholarly explanation for this pattern: people who feel secure in this world have less interest in another one.
The basic idea is that wealth allows people to feel more secure in the sense that they are confident of having their basic needs met and expect to lead a long healthy life. In such environments, there is less of a market for religion, the primary function of which is to help people cope with stress and uncertainty.
Some readers of the previous post pointed out that the U.S. is something of an anomaly because this is a wealthy country in which religion prospers. Perhaps taking the view that one swallow makes a summer, the commentators concluded that the survival of religion here invalidates the security hypothesis. I do not agree.
Explanation:
The first point to make is that the connection between affluence and the decline of religious belief is as well-established as any such finding in the social sciences. In research of this kind, the preferred analysis strategy is some sort of line-fitting exercise. No researcher ever expects every case to fit exactly on the line, and if they did, something would be seriously wrong.
