Why was Canada such a valuable property for England and France to fight over?

2 answers:

7 0

Answer:The British and French vied for control by courting local Native nations, but neither The war began with conflicts about land. Today it is part of Canada. This was an important victory for the British and helped to raise the troops morale.

Explanation:

LiRa [457]3 years ago

4 0

The French and Indian War was fought to decide if Britain or France would be the strong power in North America. France and its colonists and Indian allies fought against Britain, its colonists and Indian allies. The war began with conflicts about land. White people were destroying the Indians' hunting areas.
When Britain emerged as victorious when the treaty was signed, the British gained a lot of territories and North America was their’s and France had not won.

Hope this helped and have a nice day :)

Hope this helped and have a

You might be interested in

A scientist hypothesizes that metabolic steroids are dangerous to the health of an athlete. What will be the experimental variab

Marta_Voda [28]

The correct answer is any substance or environmental factor other than a steroid

The independent variable is the factor or behavior that is manipulated by the experimenter in order to observe the effect of that manipulation on another factor or behavior that is the dependent variable. To you It is also called the experimental or active variable.

5 0

3 years ago

PLEASE HELP!!! What are the pros and cons of a constitutional republic?

cricket20 [7]

The pros of having a republic type of government, include widespread cultivation of civic virtue, increased liberty and just laws.

The cons include mass corruption and government inefficiency.

6 0

3 years ago

Why did the Pilgrims want to leave Europe

Vsevolod [243]

The Pilgrims wanted freedom of religion.

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The association between authoritative parenting and the social competence of children might result from an underlying third fact

maria [59]

The association between authoritative parenting and the social competence of children might result from an underlying third factor such as shared genes. this best reminds us that correlation is not causation.

In authoritative parenting in this parenting fashion, the parents are nurturing, responsive, and supportive, but set firm limits for their youngsters. They try to manipulate kids' behavior by explaining rules, discussing, and reasoning. They pay attention to a child's point of view but don't always receive it.

He's grounded for 2 weeks and has to go back to the sweet and make an apology to the shop owner. His mother and father talk to him approximately why stealing is incorrect. His dad and mom are supportive and inspire him no longer to interact with such conduct again.

Research has found that authoritative parenting and father are much more likely to elevate assured kids who achieve academic achievement, have higher social abilities, and are greater capable of trouble-fixing.

Learn more about authoritative parenting here brainly.com/question/11997586

#SPJ4

7 0

2 years ago

The U.S. law, enacted in 2001, that aimed to increase educational accountability by requiring states to qualify for funding base

mario62 [17]

Answer: No Child Left Behind Act

Explanation:

No Child Left Behind Act that was enacted in 2001 by the US law tend to authorizes the federal and state education programs in US that were mostly administered and controlled by the states. This law is known to be a re-authorization of Elementary & Secondary Education Act. In the law enacted in 2002, the states were required to test and evaluate students in sections such as math and reading in grades 3 to 8 and also once in their high school.

6 0

3 years ago