Answer:
Debra Medina claimed that nullification was possible by state laws that could neutralize federal laws. She based her claim on the 10th Amendment, which establishes that any power not constitutionally granted to the federal government can be held by the states.
Explanation:
The Constitution doesn´t enable the nullification of federal laws by the states, and several academics have stated that it could be illegal since the Supremacy Clause pronounces federal laws as the supreme national law. So nullification would overthrow the constitutional interpretation held for 200 years.
Let us also remember that Gov. Rick Perry, who supported nullification, had already skipped the nullification issue by starting a debate about secession. This debate is a reminder of the time when state rejection of racial integration had to be stopped by the Supreme Court case Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka.
Despite efforts to become more diverse, minorities remain underrepresented to varying degrees in the vast majority of<span> larger police departments throughout the country. Particularly in jurisdictions experiencing rapid </span>demographic<span> shifts, police largely </span>do<span> not </span>reflect<span> on that.</span>
Problem solving characteristic that she must follow is innovation and creation.
Explanation:
The dressmaker sees a dress they had never encountered before and has no understanding on how it is made but only the finished product at her hand.
So, now, she must engage in a process of deconstructing how the dress would have been made and via understanding the parts of it make sense of what truly comprises it.
After this process she must get to finding a way to innovate these parts on her own terms and create the dress from anew.
it is a process of deconstructing and then of reconstructing using one's own adhesive creativity.
