Answer:
TRUE
Explanation:
Remember that a prosperous economy does not imply the most happy country or economy.
Therefore high rates of crime, substance abuse, insecure employment, and family dissolution may exist, but <em>the scale in which this occurs</em> may be relatively lower when compared to a poor economy.
For example, the scale of such vices in United States is lower than in Mexico a poorer economy.
<span>The first Job has a 100% chance for Mark to earn $50,000.
While the second Job Has a possible 50% chance for Mark to earn $20,000 and another possible 50% chance for him to earn $80,000 ($20,000 + $60,000)
If mark is risk neutral (Meaning that he is insensitive as regards to risk taking) and he wants to maximize his expected utility then Mark will go for the 100% chance of earning $50,000.</span>
Answer:
$47,605.83
Explanation:
future value of Takashi's savings = $30,000 x 7.3359 (FVIFA, 8%, 6 periods) = $220,077
the value of each distribution payment = $220,077 / 4.6229 (PVIFA, 8%, 6 periods) = $47,605.83
These are ordinary annuities, therefore, so we can find their annuity factors using a table.
D. leniency is based on when somebody rates an employee too high. Strictness error is when somebody was rated very very low.
