Answer:
stimulus discrimination
Explanation:
Mrs. Ridcully probably attempted that her conditioning (her own specific whistle) would eventually be generalized and other similar stimulus (dog owner's whistle) would generate the same conditioned response, but she failed. Instead, the dog discriminates Mrs. Ridcully's whistle from other people's whistle and will only respond to her.
Stimulus discrimination happens when the subject is able to differentiate between different stimuli, and will only respond to an specific stimulus.
The puppy no longer greetng Molly when she enters the house is an example of extinction. This is because the puppy lacks motivation to greet her when she enters the house because she does not have treats.
The Anglo-Saxons were a cultural group who inhabited England in the Early Middle Ages. They traced their origins to the 5th century settlement of incomers to Britain, who migrated to the island from the North Sea coastlands of mainland Europe. Some sources say that the Saxon warriors were invited to come, to the area now know as England, to help keep out invaders from Scotland and Ireland. Another reason for coming may have been because their land often flooded and it was difficult to grow crops, so they were looking for new places to settle down and farm.
Depending on if this makes an outlier, or if it is not. If it is then it will change the mean a good bit positive or negative depending on if it is it being a high or low outlier. The median will not be as effected by this new number because it will only move one point in either direction.
International law defines genocide in terms of violence committed “with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group,” yet this approach fails to acknowledge the full impacts of cultural destruction. There is insufficient international discussion of “cultural genocide,” which is a particular threat to the world's indigenous minorities. Despite the recent adoption of the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, which acknowledges the rights to culture, diversity, and self-determination, claims of cultural genocide are often derided, and their indicators dismissed as benign effects of modernity and indigenous cultural diffusion. This article considers the destruction of indigenous cultures and the forced assimilation of indigenous peoples through the analytical lens of genocide. Two case studies—the federally unrecognized Winnemem Wintu tribe in northern California and the Inuit of northern Canada—are highlighted as illustrative examples of groups facing these challenges. Ultimately, this article seeks to prompt serious discussion of cultural rights violations, which often do not involve direct physical killing or violence, and consideration of the concept “cultural genocide” as a tool for human rights promotion and protection.
