I want to become a leader that everyone wants to follow, not because they were forced or had no other choice. I want to become a leader that people feel that they can trust and share their ideas with. I don't want to be a super controlling leader, just one that is able to know what to do in any sort of situation or problem and is able to lead the rest of the team well!
I believe that the best answer for this question would be sanguine. People who fall under the category of the sanguine temperament tend to be lively, pleasure-seeking, talkative, and highly social. They can easily fall in love and may be flighty and forgetful. You can also reach this conclusion by ruling out the others; choleric individuals are angry and impulsive, melancholic individuals are introverted and solemn, and phlegmatic individuals are thoughtful and calm. Hope this helps.
Answer:
D). The nonfictional excerpt describes the reaction to the regulations.
Explanation:
As per the question, the key distinction between the presentation of regulations in the fictional and non-fictional excerpt is that the latter(non-fictional excerpt) offers a response to the ordinances presented in the former(fictional excerpt). The fictional excerpt simply reveals the directions that people are required to follow during the quarantine(should avoid...should be marked, etc.) while the non-fictional description aims to depict the reaction of setting these regulations('cutting off...shut us out'). Thus, <u>option D</u> is the correct answer.
The writer's diction<span> uses colloquial language, the diction is informal. (A)
That is the aspect of speaking.</span>
Since Richard Rodriguez is a writer that emphasized his origins as the son of Mexican immigrants, but nevertheless was raised by the American academia and society. In the essay of Hunger of Memory, he stated how after being part of a socially disadvantaged family, that although it was very close, the extreme public alienation, made him feel in disadvantage to other children as he grew up. Due to this, 30 years later he pays essential attention to how from being a socially aligned to a Mexican immigrant child, he grew up to be an average American man. He analyses his persona from that social point of view of being different in the race but similar in the customs. Hence, the author finds himself struggling with his identity.
A good example of it, it’s the manner he introduces his last name. A Spanish rooted last name, which may seem difficult to pronounce to a native English speaker. The moment the author introduces himself and tries to clarify its pronunciation to an American person, he mentions how his parents are no longer his parents in a cultural sense.
His parents belong to a different culture, his parents grew up in a different context, they were raised with different values and ways; in that sense, Rodriguez culturally sees himself as an American, his education was different to his parents’. He doesn’t see his parents as his culture-educators, he adamantly rejects the idea that he might be able to claim "unbroken ties" to his inherited culture to the ones of White Americans who would anoint him to play out for them some drama of ancestral reconciliation. As the author said, “Perhaps because I am marked by the indelible color they easily suppose that I am unchanged by social mobility, that I can claim unbroken ties with my past.”
