Answer:
So a favorable material price variance might be more than offset by an adverse usage variance
Explanation:
<em>Material price variance</em>
<em>A material price variance occurs where materials are purchased at a price either lower or higher than the standard price. </em>A favourable variance is recorded where the actual total cost of materials of a given quantity is lower that the standard cost. While an adverse variance implies the opposite
<em>Material usage variance</em>
<em>A material usage variance occurs when the standard quantity required to active a particular level of production is higher or lower than than the actual actual quantity used.</em> A favorable variance would mean than less quantity of materials were used than the standard to achieve a given output level. And an adverse variance would mean the opposite
<em>Relationship between Usage variance and Price variance</em>
Where savings are made from purchase of cheap and inferior quality materials these might lead to an adverse usage variance by a greater value .This is so because workers might need to use a larger quantity ( more than the standard required) of a low-quality materials to achieve production.
So a favourable material price variance might be more than offset by an adverse usage variance
Answer:
9
Explanation:
In word problems, “as many times as” can be translated into multiplication.
If Molly plants 1.5 times as my pink flowers as white flowers, we would multiply 1.5*(number of white flowers) to find out the number of pink flowers.
Because the question tells us there are 6 white flowers, we multiply 1.5*6, which equals 9.
I hope this helps!
Answer:
$4,300
Explanation:
Calculation for what amount should Nelson report for total ending inventory on its Dec. 31 balance sheet
Total ending inventory=( 200*3.50)+(400*1.50)+ (1,000*3.00)
Total ending inventory=$700+$600+$3,000
Total ending inventory=$4,300
Therefore the amount that Nelson should report for total ending inventory on its Dec. 31 balance sheet will be $4,300
Answer:
Economic integration agreement is when countries within a particular geographical area decide to remove or relax tariff or non-tariff barriers to trade between themselves and also to coordinate and harmonize their fiscal and economic policies. Free trade area is the simplest form of an economic integration; it is when governments of member countries agree to remove trade restriction between each other and when member countries are given the freedom to determine their own external trade policies towards non-members.
Supporters of free trade area argue that it is beneficial to the country based on the trade creation argument. Trade creation is where high-cost domestic production is replaced by more efficiently produced imports from within the group; that is, more expensive domestic products are replaced by lower priced imports from countries within the group. The trade creation argument is hinged on the fact that a free trade area ensures that trade is generated over and above what would otherwise have happened if there was no integration. Further, the removal of tariffs allows members to specialize in those products for which they have a comparative advantage leading to a variety of cheap imports for domestic consumers, thereby increasing living standards or welfare gains. Trade creation also creates an incentive for high cost domestic producers to cut cost so as to remain competitive thereby enhancing efficiency.
On the other hand, a free trade area is criticized on the basis of trade diversion. This is where trade with a low-cost country outside the group is influenced by higher–cost products supplied from within the group; this results in a less efficient allocation of resources as trade from outside the group is replaced by trade from within the group. Trade diversion could mean that local consumers would have to buy products at less competitive prices. Another argument would be that a free trade area would lead to a removal of tariff between member countries thereby resulting in a cessation of government revenue from tariffs. As opposed to a free trade area, free trade would increase world output and employment, raise quality and lower prices of goods as firms have access to factor inputs; it will also increase world living standards or enhances welfare gains. A free trade agreement only restricts these potential advantages to a particular geographical space.
Explanation:
