The "Watergate Scandal" <span>proved to be President Nixon's undoing, since it was shown that President Nixon had played a role in the break in and theft attempt at the Watergate Hotel. </span>
6.) <em>C) It was the first time the Supreme Court struck down a state law as unconstitutional.</em>
<em>The state of Maryland tried to tax the national bank, then the Supreme court ruled that the national bank and the federal government was immune to state taxes.</em>
8.) <em>A)The garment industry</em>
<em>This industry was the quickest way for a Jewish person to be able to own a business.</em>
<span>It was Chinggis Khaan.</span>
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although the previous link was not attached, we can say the following.
The central ideas or information of a primary or secondary source are the following,
A primary resource comes from the people who witnessed the event, the incident, or the specific moment. These people could have written their own descriptions, testimonies, books, or maybe journalists that directly reported what happened. It also could be an interview with people who were part of the historical event. For instance, if it is a soldier that participated in the Vietnam War, a journalist can interview him and use it as a primary source.
On the other hand, secondary sources can be obtained from other sources that were not direct. This could be an author that based its story in other investigations, or it could be encyclopedias.
Answer:
The correct answer is A. As a result of 20th century Supreme Court rulings, symbolic political speech gained substantial protections from government regulations.
Explanation:
Symbolic speech is a term that describes communicative situations in which the message transmitted is not literally expressed by the interlocutor. This type of speech is covered by the First Amendment implicitly.
Rulings such as Tinker v. Des Moines, United States v. O'Brien, Texas v. Johnson, and Cohen v. California expanded the protection of this type of discourse, including it within the protections of the First Amendment to freedom of expression.
For example, in the case Texas v. Johnson, it was established that the burning of an American flag involved a case of symbolic speech, so it should not be subject to prohibition by any type of law.
