1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
stepan [7]
3 years ago
9

Should the president be less in his military powers

History
2 answers:
Rufina [12.5K]3 years ago
8 0
The president has more power over the general.
kramer3 years ago
8 0

nope

Explanation:

of course yes ,In this capacity, the president exercises supreme operational command and control over all military personnel and militia members, and has plenary power to launch, direct and supervise military operations, order or authorize the deployment of troops, unilaterally launch nuclear weapons, and form military policy with ...!!!!

You might be interested in
¿cuáles fueron los cambios que trajo consigo el desarrollo
Taya2010 [7]

Answer:

What were the changes brought about by the development

economic does of the Mexican miracle in everyday life

Explanation:

Hop this helps!!

4 0
2 years ago
Would you rather live under a fascist government or a communist government? Why?
MAXImum [283]

Answer:

communist, because in a fascist you are brutally oppressed while in communist, you have a few more rights while you own none of it.

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who tried to improve the living conditions of immigrants by establishing Hull House?
olya-2409 [2.1K]
Hull House was a settlement place co founded by 1889 by Jane Addams and Ellen Gates Starr. 
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
During reconstruction, president andrew johnson tried to incorporate most of president abraham lincoln's plan for
blagie [28]

<span>Readmitting the Southern States into the Union</span>

<span>
</span>
8 0
3 years ago
At the beginning of the Constitutional Convention, the delegates agreed on a set of rules. One
loris [4]

Answer:

A. It would allow the delegates to speak openly and honestly with each other

D.  It would prevent the delegates from being pressured by the public

Explanation:

A. It would allow the delegates to speak openly and honestly with each other

   [] With the secrecy rule, the delegates could speak openly since this would not reach the public. It helped to let them make decisions since there was less pressure from the public (ties into option D).

D.  It would prevent the delegates from being pressured by the public

   [] If the public didn't know what was going on, they could not pressure

     The second and third options do not make sense because the delegates wanted everyone to attend (they also wanted the votes to be as unanimous as possible) and they were not planning specific military strategies at this time.

Have a nice day!

     I hope this is what you are looking for, but if not - comment! I will edit and update my answer accordingly.

- Heather

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • In 1215, england's king john was forced to sign a document limiting the king's powers; it was called the
    14·1 answer
  • How did slavery as practiced in West Africa differ from later practiced in the Americas
    5·1 answer
  • Which major event was an effect of the United States policy of Manifest Destiny &amp; Why?
    13·1 answer
  • What four commanders and their troops met at Yorktown
    9·1 answer
  • Which states would have supported the Three-Fifths Compromise?
    12·1 answer
  • What is the definition of Aryan?
    7·1 answer
  • John's writing style included Hebrew parallelism.<br> True<br> False
    14·1 answer
  • Because the ancient Egyptians did not have a compass, the pyramid was used to help determine the direction (North, South, East,
    6·1 answer
  • Can someone please help ! I did not mean to click that answer btw !
    14·1 answer
  • Easy question :3
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!