Answer:
It is certainly not fun to serve other people all the time and it most certainly takes placing the needs of others before your own personal needs. Even the individual who is taken into consideration to be selfless does not always wish to serve his or her enemies. However, even the person who are most selfish would end up serving Jesus Christ is by any chance he walked into a room, therefore, what is the dissimilarity, in accordance to Jesus Christ there should not be any difference.
What it means to a youth missionary' serving others is generally following Jesus first and walking by the Holy Spirit as they are spreading the gospel of Jesus Christ and making disciples of Jesus Christ of every nation. This is usually accomplished by building relationships with the people who are unbelievers, living interculturally with them and serving them.
Serving other is an essential job due to the fact that Jesus Christ Claim that the end will not arrive until every tongue, nation, and tribe have been able to heard the good ne. Jesus Christ has offered the Youth with the job of going and making disciples of these nations, baptizing people in the name of the Father, the son, and the Holy Spirit so that he can be able to come back and takes us to heaven with him.
Explanation:
Because you are so familiar with your document, other people are better at pointing out it’s flaws.
The answer is the last one, D. All of the other transitions indicate that the writer will either go into further detail on the subject or list other reasons as to why this would be correct. However, D clearly uses a contrasting transition to introduce a new argument.
Answer and Explanation:
The author shows how American companies have a strong influence on the economy of Singapore, as in other countries and that because of this influence, the American government can impose that not only Singapore, but that all countries have better attitudes, otherwise these companies can be withdrawn from these countries, which would cause certain economic problems.
In other words, the author states that the USA cannot impose American values in foreign territories, but it can cause these values to be met using the influence it has economically in those territories, through the list of American companies that the foreign country has.
