Answer: All right, here goes nothing. *cracks knuckles*
To begin with, the article has a weak claim. While it does vaguely introduce their stance on the topic, it poses it as a question and not a statement. Also, this claim is written in the first person, unlike strong claims that are supposed to be written in the third person. As for the "support" section, even the very beginning strays from the original claim, instead saying why <em>they </em>should own a pet instead of why <em>everyone</em> should be allowed to own pets. For example, in the second paragraph, the author cites a story from a friend of a friend. That is not valid evidence. If it was on the news, however, and the author cited that as evidence instead, the article would be much stronger. The author also delves deeper into their own personal life instead of stating facts as they should have. The transition between paragraphs is clunky at best, with the third paragraph pretty much restating the claim instead of simply saying something like "Pets are helpful to our society." And finally, the entire purpose of that last sentence seems to be to wrap up the article in a hasty fashion, without any attention to restating the claim or the facts presented.
Hope this meets the criteria! Good luck!!
Answer:
1. Employment rate
2. Real Earnings
Explanation:
Coincident indicators are indicators or pointers that help define the actual situation or predict the possible outcome of a given state or country's economic performance over a given period.
Various coincident indicators can be used by economists to determine the economic state of a place, some of which include: employment, real earnings, average working hours, average wages and salaries, and the unemployment rate and among many others.
Hence, in this case, two coincident indicators used in forecasting are: Employment and Real Earnings
Answer:
The conflict was that the prince was unable to find a girl that was actually a princess because most of the girls he found on his search were fake.
Explanation:
<span>March 4, 1933, was perhaps the Great Depression's darkest hour. The stock market had plunged 85% from its high in 1929, and nearly one-fourth of the workforce was unemployed. In the cities, jobless men were lining up for soup and bread. In rural areas, farmers whose land was being foreclosed were talking openly of revolution. The crowd that gathered in front of the Capitol that day to watch Franklin D. Roosevelt's Inauguration had all but given up on America. They were, a reporter observed, "as silent as a group of mourners around a grave."</span>
The answers on E2020 are
B. a claim
C. supporting reasons
E. supporting evidence
F. a counterclaim and a rebuttal
(I just completed the Test Review with a 100%)
