17-19 80-90 that way you can multiply the years
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Please give me a heart and brainliest
The case <em>Miranda v. Arizona (1966)</em> was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court in which the court established that prosecutors cannot use a person's statements made in response to interrogation in police custody as evidence at their trial, unless the person was informed of what is known as "Miranda warning," but voluntarily waived these rights.
A "Miranda warning" is an explanation given to people arrested that informs them of the right to consult with an attorney before and during questioning. It also informs them of the right against self-incrimination before police questioning. The court's ruling protect those accused of a crime because it prevents them from incriminating themselves. It also reminds them of the importance of an attorney for achieving a successful trial.
The best and most correct answer among the choices provided by your question is the second choice. The president selects a justice for the Supreme Court to whom he considers the most qualified and will most likely support his agenda. I hope my answer has come to your help. Thank you for posting your question here in Brainly.
